Jump to content
Political Discussion Forums

pinky tuscadero

  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

22 Excellent

About pinky tuscadero

  • Rank
    Junior Member

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Look at the below numbers (again) and all the sourced material here (including experts in epidemiology/virology, etc.), hundreds of hours of research to comb through. A rational/cognitive person cannot look at this evidence and conclude the lockdown of society was warranted. Annual deaths from seasonal flu - 650 000 (5 000 000 severe illnesses) Corona deaths - 170 455 (2 481 866 cases worldwide with most showing no or mild symptoms) There are none so blind, as those who refuse to see.
  2. It says right there under Info/History all the authors are from 'stanford.edu', come on, do I have to hand-hold you and your ilk for everything. Now I have to explain what 'peer review' is and how it is not the be all and end all to science, because apparently you have never looked into it yourself. (link to below quotes) And the final death knell for peer review, and the overwhelming great importance of having two studies that reached the same conclusion (observable, verifiable, repeatable, falsifiable):
  3. You don't honestly believe that do you? As to the 'rows' of refrigerator trucks, that may be a slight exaggeration, and a couple of trucks may not even be out of the ordinary during bad flu seasons. Don't forget this is a city used to over 10 000 deaths a month, and so far this corona has 10 000 over 4 months (and this is their massaged/made-up numbers). Did you also immediately believe the crying nurse who had no masks and feared for herself and her family? Did you socially share/like this video and did you socially recant when it was discovered she was a fraud? Anyway nice thread sliding, the important info is now buried back a page and I am arguing with people who simply parrot the fear porn.
  4. Annual deaths from seasonal flu - 650 000 (5 000 000 severe illnesses) Corona deaths - 170 455 (2 481 866 cases worldwide with most showing no or mild symptoms) There are the numbers, but I am the mad one. Can you at least show some semblance of intellectual honesty and admit you are not sure what is going on? Or simply look at those numbers above and change your position to match the data and fight for humanity. That should shock anyone into questioning why we are down a trail whose door is quickly closing behind us.
  5. You don't honestly believe that do you? That is preposterous. Do you understand that anyone who dies and may, or may not have, corona is counted as a corona death in the USA? Here is CDC's directive to doctors to just make-up the corona deaths to make the small numbers appear larger: The models have been wrong, the chosen 'experts' have been wrong, people are dying and many others are losing their livelihoods for this lie. What will it take for someone like you to actually read the data and listen to those that have been right from the very outset?
  6. When will we admit those that have said this is akin to a regular to bad flu-season were right all along. From the beginning numbers to today, the data (as massaged as it was, never, ever fulfilled their ridiculous models or hyperbole. We sacrificed our freedoms, destroyed lives and livelihoods for a flu, something that occurs every single year with little fanfare. Yet we still listen to the very people that have been wrong from the beginning, and the people that have been right from the beginning are still relegated to the hinterlands and called names to discredit their ability to rightly divide this matter. This is utter madness. Here is today's study corroborating the study done by Stanford from two days ago, that means it is established not fanciful computer models (ie. truth, actual science). The Stanford study, quoted below, can be found here.
  7. Just some humor and/or cabin fever. It does not matter to me which thread stays or goes.
  8. Me = 1 CBC = 0 and I don't even get $1 400 000 000 a year, definitely a win in my book Suck it, Sycophantic CBC (a little alliteration for another win)
  9. Just click where it says 'Oil' in my post. Any word, or string of words, that is blue and underlined is a hotlink and will automatically take you to the linked website.
  10. Please wake up people, the corona is but one ingredient in their cake. Cake = Planning + Gathering PS. You are not invited to the party.
  11. Buckle-up kiddies, it's going to be a rough ride. Oil
  12. One should never hinder the free movement of anyone (I even dislike when union picketers do this, it is a form of bullying, or worse it actively seeks out a physical confrontation). To me, the more information available and freely shared (on any topic) is good for society, I abhor the current state of 'I and my friends have decided the debate is over, now shut-up'.
  13. Very few pro-abortionists watch the 'procedure' from the womb perspective, there tune would change in an instant. There is a reason why they fight tooth and nail to have even pictures banned. You would think the very premise that this may be infanticide leads one to a very deep research. Instead we get them all chanting 'Hoes need abortions, Hoes need abortions.', or gross oversimplifications like 'my body, my choice'. Now we have gone to one of the last stops on this train, baby born but one little toe still inside and you can kill him/her and if it survives you let it die in alone on the floor. But somehow in people's minds this is still okay, because if they admit this is not okay, they have to admit a much larger discussion has to take place, they are in a corner. Here is a good article from a former abortion doc. Suddenly, this was looking really different to me. For the first time in my life it hit me very powerfully, that this woman had come to me figuratively and said…here’s $800, kill my baby. And I was the type of person who would look right back at her very calmly, and say why sure, I’ll do that. You can start here for a perspective of what we may call Christian Universalism (different from Unitarianism), I would recommend that site to believer and un-believer alike.
  14. Here it is again for you: Debate is more successful if all the debaters have some grasp of logic. Religious people rarely do, as their entire goal is to protect God and that requires a great deal of illogical and sometimes even delusional thinking. Ok, I gotcha. Any debate about God/religion is an abject failure unless both parties are atheists. Now it makes perfect sense, thanks for the clarification.
  • Create New...