Jump to content
Political Discussion Forums


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Posts posted by BubberMiley

  1. Rather than type that all out, you could have saved a lot of trouble by first figuring out what "intentionally" means in the context of that sentence. He was saying the police do not use the taser with the intent to kill. This is a fact. They quoted his true statement accurately. This is what we want journalists to do.

  2. 56 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:


    So, if I may paraphrase that mess, all you have is you feel it's unfair to refer to the autopsy report calling it a homicide because the "layman" would assume homicide is murder (which the cop has been charged with). You are trying to suppress and adapt the truth based on your feelings. Fake news!

    And you say it's unfair to quote a lawyer who said that police use tasers because they aren't as deadly because...tasers can be deadly. But it's still true what the lawyer said---that they use tasers because they aren't lethal like guns are. Again, you're trying to suppress the lawyer's speech because it hurts your feelings. Once again, fake news on your part.


  3. All your examples are you either misrepresenting their reporting, you misrepresenting the facts, or you declaring your feelings to be the undisputed truth.

    There are, for example, no news reports that said Brooks was killed just for sleeping in the drive thru. They all mention the taser. Your portrayal of their reporting is an outright lie. 

    So now I can cite specific incidents where you have reported a verifiable lie without retraction. But you still haven't managed to do that with the MSM.

    • Thanks 1
  4.  1) Dr Ford's story has credibility

    Absolutely.  All you ever did was attack her character. No one provided any evidence that she wasn't completely truthful.

    2) Brionna was killed in bed

    i didn't follow that story, but I understandshe was in bed when the police broke in. Do you have evidence to the contrary?

    3) Antifa doesn't exist,

    Nobody ever said that. They said it isn't an organization with an identifiable leadership structure, which is true.

    4) the riots were mostly peaceful,

    nobody said that. They said the protests were mostly peaceful, which is true.

    5) Trump committed sedition but Waters/Pelosi/Omar/M.Obama/Kamala etc never did,

    I'm not aware of them instigating a riot to overthrow the democratic process. Do you have evidence they did?

    6) Rayshard was killed just for sleeping at a drive thru,

    I don't know who that is.

    7) cops walked up on Floyd with guns drawn just because he was black and then murdered him while he wasn't resisting,

    Everybody saw exactly what happened in the video. They described what we all saw.

    M Brown was a gentle giant,

    They aren't allowed to say nice things about murdered Black guys you don't know? Fake news!

    9) anonymous sources are always 100% trustworthy but people who attended meetings can't be trusted to report on what was said there,

     I call BS. Cite?

    10) Bombshell evidence is coming out 156 weeks in a row on Russian collusion and yet at the end there's still zero,

    it's not zero. Not even close.

    11) Trump asked Zelenski for a favour and then he asked about Biden's QPQ (the transcripts clearly show that to be a straight-up lie),

    I am unfamiliar. Provide more details and maybe you have something here. We'll see.

    12) there's no reason whatsoever to question Biden's actions in Ukraine,

    No one said that, but maybe someone said there was no evidence to implicate him.

    13) Trump was so crazy that he should have been removed by the 25th Amendment but Biden's cognitive abilities are perfect fine, etc?

    Trump instigated a riot where 5 people died. He even ignored calls for help while he watched on TV. Biden outdebated Trump. Sounds like fake news on your part.

    • Thanks 2
  5. 18 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

    Blah, blah, blah.

    Either tell me why inferring that Trump was a likely motivation for the incident or admit that CNN was lying, as usual. 

    He called them very good people in Charlotteseville when they were chanting "Jews will not replace us." for starters. Maybe the guy at his rally with the Camp Auschwitz" shirt or the one with the 6MWNE shirt can give you an idea why Don Lemon's opinion is not a "lie".


  6. 19 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

    I told you that CNN tried to infer that "Trump's anti-Semitism" was the most obvious reason for the violence.

    That was patently stupid, Trump's pro-Israel record and family offer concrete proof that he isn't guilty of anti-Semitism or of supporting it.

    You could quote the words he said in the context of his opinion so that we can see your misrepresentation. Alternatively, you could cite ACTUAL NEWS where you feel they misrepresented facts, because that's what your initial accusation was---that their news was fake, not that you disagree with Don Lemon's opinion.

  7. 23 minutes ago, sharkman said:

    Hah, that "lawsuit" will never see a court, because if it does, all of their dirty deeds done will have to be heard by the courts involved.  Witnesses from the US, Italy, Germany and South America will sink Dominion like an enraged Kraken.  This is just Dominion trying to get some good press while they can.  

    You say that with the secure knowledge that you are probably much too insignificant to be sued for libeling a company with no evidence whatsoever.

    • Like 1
  8. 9 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

    All you have to do is prove that one of their stories wasn't a huge lie. Just pick one, and I'll tell you how they lied about it.

    Feel free to pick one yourself. Just make sure it falls under the specific topic of "America under Trump" so we don't get scolded for going "off topic".

  9. 1 minute ago, WestCanMan said:

    It was blatantly idiotic disinformation, like I said many times before, and you only asked for one Buber so don't act like I didn't meet your quota.

    There are plenty more, and I gave you guys almost 15 stories to choose from so that you could pick your own example of when CNN didn't lie. This should be the easiest thing on earth, right? Just pick one of the 15 topics and act like CNN didn't just lie about it...

    You sent me on a goose chase, listening to a 15 minute opinion piece with nothing but verifiable facts and commentary. No lies at all.

  10. 22 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

    You and I both know what's up sap. 

    You're caught up in the never-ending lie that's CNN coverage and you're too invested in it to give up now.

    Like the frog who jumped into some cool water, you'll stay there until the bitter end regardless of how hot it gets.

    If it were a never-ending lie, you would be able to come up with a better example of that than Don Lemon expressing his legitimate opinion.

  11. 24 minutes ago, sharkman said:

    Yes, but can  you see how perfectly every single thing has gone for Biden's side in the election aftermath?  Every. single.  shred of something awry is quickly proven online to be incorrect.  I've never seen this kind of perfection, and it's too perfect.  It's a full court press by the MSM, big tech, etc that just doesn't add up, because no administration is ever this perfect.  Believe whatever makes you happy.

    You find it suspicious that it's so easy to shoot down stupid BS? 

  • Create New...