Jump to content
Forum Maintenance OVER - please report any issues Read more... ×
Political Discussion Forums

Rue

Members
  • Content Count

    9,625
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    21

Rue last won the day on February 11

Rue had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

542 Excellent

About Rue

  • Rank
    Rue

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

10,341 profile views
  1. Rue

    Syncretic Party - New political group

    Like I am deeply offended the leader of the Syncretic Party ignored moi. I will say the politically syncretic approaches being claimed by this Syncretic Party Leader are a classic example of how positions that are too flexible i can not support anything. I would suggest this attempt to pose jello as something solid he grasps is an absurdity. He can try hold it all he wants it simply oozes out and makes a mess. This is why someone invented diapers by the way,
  2. Rue

    Syncretic Party - New political group

    Hey you can't use the word fairies anymore. The politically correct reference is Liberal Party of Canada.
  3. Rue

    America's gun problem or is it?

    . Lol. Now I feel bad accusing Z man of smoking Liberal doobies on the other thread re. Jody out to get Justin. Lol. Z man we both know your secret...Judy Lamarsh was your hero!
  4. Rue

    America's gun problem or is it?

    Z is a middle of the roader like many of us on this forum. You have to read all his posts. He is a genuine middle of the roader. He's also no fascist. He has opinions on all sides of the equation depending on the issues. You'll be wrong if you label him left or right or anything he is just a Z-man.
  5. Rue

    America's gun problem or is it?

    You've gone too far n. Ease up. You and I know many Canadian war vets who would disagree with the above. Don't white wash them all as idiot puppets. Tell me if I am wrong if you want but Rear Admiral Murray and Commander Prentice were no puppets and neither was Air Marshall Edwards or Maj Gen. Hoffmeister for example. Yes the allied forces were loyal to the British command to an extent but come on we had some powerful men who did their own damn thing when they had to. I also think and you are well aware we considered Churchill our leader and our military was genuinely an admirer of Churchill and King George nnot McKenzie King who was an embarrassment. Back on topic our country was founded by people who wanted to keep paying taxes to King George. We rejected the gun in favour of North West Mounted Police with no We are a nation that went so far with Lester B. Pearson so as to reinvent the gunless soldier, the peacekeeper. Hell we love leaders that lisp like Lester and Justin or are close to their mothers like Justin and Willie McKenzie King. Hell our first Prime Minister was a projectile vomiter in Parliament-that's the only thing he shot off. Diefenbaker damn near striked out over John F's missiles. We do not embrace gun swagger. I think if anyone analyzes our military history, most of our generals and military leaders of W2 who made a difference never cared to suck up to anyone but did have a chain of command they honoured yes. I think you mistake our loyalty with sucking up. That was a genuine loyalty. No one told my father and his peers to suck up to any Brit. They genuinely admired Churchill and felt a genuine loyalty to the King. It kept some of them focused on what they were fighting for. The King of England was another understated quiet leader but he was a leader. He showed up in the bombings and he carried the weight his brother abandoned not with swagger but with quite dignity. Say what you want about Churchill but his persona was not flashy it was rough, brash, crude, but always respectful of the life of each soldier. He drank himself to oblivion worrying over how many people he was getting killed...and people knew that beneath the brave façade was a caring man a true antithesis to Hitler and Stalin.
  6. Rue

    Trudeau lying about SNC

    Lol thou may be right for a day or two. Canada's state broadcaster and for that matter Global and CTV however love Lord Justin and I think will refocus to Donald shortly. You do over-estimate the attention span of United Empire Loyalists on our own navel not to mention our obsession with the US genitilia I mean POTUS.
  7. Now you put it that way, hello I agree with you on your comments unfortunately what you say is the cold reality.
  8. Rue

    Trudeau lying about SNC

    Of course. You see Lord Justin expects some recognition of his divine essence. Now in your country, the leader goes out of his way to insult and generate hate to get votes while Lord Justin wishes his fans adore him and line up in the streets waving as he drives by on his chariot wih Queen Sophie and their Royal Family decked out in Royal garb. The only think Lord Justin needs to really start doing is wearing his wig, lip stick and beauty mark while fanning himself and touching his nose with his kerchief up his sleeve. Someone do get Lord Justin a twist of snuff to get the smell of the masses out of his left nostril.
  9. Rue

    Trudeau lying about SNC

    Oh come on. Get with the paranoia. Smoke one of those legalized cigarettes. Z-man is smoking too many Liberal doobies.. Its clear Trudeau tried to pressure Judge Jody and she balked and walked. I doubt she runs next election. Watch her get a judgeship somewhere. I also think people need to take a long hard look at this elitist privileged snot Lord Justin of True-dough and toss him out on his ass next election. The pathetic attempt to pander to Chinese in BC on the weekend was about as pathetic as it gets. His pandering comments stereotype to such a degree I can not imagine how any person at his rally could have stood their grinning along with this idiot for photos. I am astonished after that last smiley idiot routine on Sunday China did not invade. Hell even Taiwan would have been tempted. He is the worst ethnic panderer I have ever witnessed. He makes the late Linda Lovelace look absolutely shallow.
  10. Rue

    Trudeau lying about SNC

    That is of course the point. First off if the statement were true then China has every right to have its snitty fit and demand their darling Princess. be released. That said, it is absolute bullshit to say our system allows for politicians to influence judicial proceedings while Lord Justin poses as being above the law to China. Which one is it?. Our country is founded on the principle of the "rule of law" the most basic and fundamental of concepts that says NO ONE is above the law. The three branches of government, judiciary, civil service (administrative) and elected are to remain separate and apart and not allowed to influence one another. It is the most basic of legal concepts built into our legal system to prevent the erosion of democracy. If a politician controlled how the law was interpreted and enforced we would no longer have democracy. Trudeau knows that. This is precisely what he told China while a the same time he influence peddled on Lavalin and he has in the past over illegal refugees, the Aga Khan, Omar Kadr. If a Judge renders a decision interpreting a law in which the politicians did not intend it to be interpreted it is their role then to amend the wording which they then due with regulations. Isn't it interesting the same Liberals who used to absolutely piss their pants over Harper's comments over the Supreme Court of Canada Judges, now suddenly trying to back flop and justify influence peddling of the worst kind and sheeyat on Jody for not allowing herself to be politically compromised on areas of law she legally had no right to alter. To use the Justice Minister to look the other way on a legal obligation because the person you are calling favour for is a large contributor for you in Quebec is called influence peddling pure and simple. Trudeau got away with Kadr with a back room deal is it any surprise he did it again with Lavalin? He showed with the Aga Kahn he does what he wants and to hell with the consequences. Wasn't too long ago for example Jean Charest as a Sports Minister in the Murloney cabinet almost lost his career over calling up a Judge in his riding regarding one of his constituents. No the PM does not talk to the Justice Mnister or ANY Justice official on an on-going case yet to be determined in court. No it has never been something condoned let alone defined as a normal course of affairs. We all know why Jody was sent packing. She wouldn't cowtow to Lord Justin of Snit Snot so he had a snit snot and demoted her. Now its pile on time. She's an angry aboriginal. She's selfish and me first. She's not a team payer. All the usual Liberal scum parasite hangers on are issuing the anonymous barbs. This is a pathetic government. It blatantly violates the code of ethics and has its leader fly for a vacation with someone asking him for government donations and when confronted on it lies. He out and out lied. He said he would consult with the Ethics Commissioner and never did and stood up in Parliament like some little snit snot spoiled boy refusing to answer the question as to why he said he would talk to the Ehics Commissioner and then he did not. He had a Finance Minister use his insider knowledge to sell stock in his family company knowing it would devalue due to an impending law and Lord Justin sees nothing wrong in that. Lord Justin had no problem when his Defence Minister out and out lied as to his military record and got caught red handed. He had no problem with his Cultural Minister out and out lying in Parliament. He appoints not one but 2 Indian Affairs cabinet ministers, neither having a thing to show for their appointments. He made a back-room pay-off of 10 million to a terrorist abd promoted the terrorist's lawyer to a seat on a Federal court bench. My favourite though is he openly tells the world to break Canada's Immigration laws and enter illegally and he will push them to the front of the line ahead of legitimate immigration appicants and hey why not give them work permits. Trudeau follow the law? He's a snit. The very essence of his life prior to becoming PM is that he was and remains privileged and above the law, and people like him deicde what the law is at any given moment and we are to go along blindly. There's no legal process with this Liberal or any Liberal. As long as they want something, presto, its legal. Trudeau is a lying immoral privileged above the law elitist at this point breaking any law willy nilly when he does not like it. It is what spoiled rich kid silver spoons do. No one can say no to them, They demand and get and surround themselves with servants to bring him his milk.
  11. Rue

    Trudeau lying about SNC

    Hello. This is Canada. Whoever is responsible will be paid $10 million.
  12. Rue

    America's gun problem or is it?

    I thought you were referring to soldiers as being child killers. Sorry. I am off this thread. Sorry. Misunderstood,
  13. Rue

    America's gun problem or is it?

    You are 100% correct. Given out for malaria. Fucked up some people. All of them can phack up peoplke: Atovaquone, Choloquine, Doxycycline, Mefloquine, Primaquine.
  14. Rue

    America's gun problem or is it?

    I defer to both D's No no. You are way off Jim. You are mistaking the people sent to put out the fire with the people who started the fire. Don't.
  15. Rue

    America's gun problem or is it?

    Jim you are quite correct. Ironically Einstein was neither a nationalist or any type of militarist. A lot of people to this day mistake is role with the role of Robert Oppenheimer. Oppenheimer of course after WW2 ended was Chair of the General Advisory Committee of the US Atomic Energy and publically advocated strict control of nuclear weapons and the US government because of revoked his security clearance. He was made a persona non grata. Einstein's views as to pacifism were well known and well enunciated. For anyone to say he was not sure of himself or his political views is absolutely incorrect. He spent many papers, interviews and talks on the concept of God and world peace. He referred to God in an abstract way as the source of the energy very much like Spinoza. He was against the notion of people praying to a personal God out of fear and saw all life forms and energy interconnected and so ethics as being the conduct of humans to be determined by us as to how we wanted to help or harm the world in our individual or group decisions. He was a scientist not a politician and as such transcended rigid ideological arguments calling on black and white positions. He believed in using logic and objective methodology to establish positions of understanding not emotions based on fear or pride. He was against the use of any weapons and so was Oppenheimer for that matter. To suggest they were pro guns or pro weapons is nonsense. For that matter, Harry Truman who authorized the use of the two nuclear bombs was the same man who personally confronted Curtis E. Lemay of the US Air Force and General McCarthur in Korea who both demanded he use the nuclear bomb against China. Curtis E. Lemay the head of the US Air Force and some say was the character Dr. Strangelove referred to in that movie, was actually put down by Truman, Eisenhower, Johnson, and Kennedy when he would try argue the use of the nuclear bomb in Vietnam or in a war against Russia. Eisenhower, then Kissinger in fact were the primary reasons Israel did not use nuclear weapons in a pre-emptive strike against Russia in the 50's, 60's and 70's. We've come far closer than people think to nuclear war and some of the people we think are war mongers were in fact the ones preventing these wars. I find if you could take someone who advocates the use of a gun and make them clean up the brains of someone blown to bits-it changes their opinion a lot of times. I would like to take everyone who advocates the use of weapons to clean up the bodies and put the parts in bags and label them. People who advocate the use of guns are never soldiers or police or emergency personnel, physicians, its usually people who fear others and feel the gun gives them protection. Its a fallacy of clean people. People with blood and body parts sprayed on them don't think that way. I always argue only soldiers and police are trained and can properly understand just how last resort weapons are and how they are not some panacea or Viagra for instant strength and power. If someone really wants to defend themselves they need to learn martial arts-the first thing it will teach them is to walk away and only use as much force as is necessary to contain if that becomes necessary. The primal need to have a gun is nothing more than a homo sapien demanding a club to bash someone in the head with. Its time we walk upright. This has nothing to do with leftist or rightist ideology and everything to do with discipline and learning to control primal instincts. Leftist and rightist ideologies have both embraced weapons and violence. People like Einstein and Oppenheimer were not either. They were scientists caught in a world where politicians wanted to use their knowledge for the wrong reasons requiring like Truman they make choices at certain times as to which use of the weapon would cause the least damage not the most damage. Truman's horrid decisions were right. Far more innocent people would have died in a continuing war in Japan. People also forget carpet bombings like in Dresden, Germany were psychologically as devastating as the nuclear bombs in Japan. Some people question if they were necessary,. Some argue it was the only way to get Germany to surrender. Weapons come in many forms. Bibles for example. The problem is guns have the most immediate effect. Words can be devastating but take longer to deliver and sink in. Show me a person who wants a gun and I will show you someone with small genitals except Annie Oakley. I learned how to use a gun. I think target practice or skeet shooting is a great hobby. Genuine hunters I have no problem with having rifles. They are a necessity to eat and in the event an animal is rabid, etc. Go run around a city shooting at people you need the gun stuffed up butt and shot off. Regards, John Wayne Annie Oakley Chuck Heston Jed Clampett
×