Jump to content
Political Discussion Forums

bcsapper

Members
  • Content Count

    12,621
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    45

bcsapper last won the day on March 17

bcsapper had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

1,590 Excellent

About bcsapper

  • Rank
    Senior Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Ilkley Moor. No hat.

Recent Profile Visitors

34,441 profile views
  1. Yeah, arseholes. Couldn't happen to better ideology.
  2. Hahaha, because a Priest said so, you mean.
  3. I can understand a scientist being agnostic. After all, science is the search for truth, and as there is no way to prove the non-existence of a supreme being, it's a reasonable position to take. As long as it doesn't take up too much of their time. They have diseases to cure. Other planets to reach. But a scientist who believes in God is acting on faith. Nothing wrong with that. But they are no longer scientists when they do.
  4. Yeah, I think such are a matter of record, and given the times in which some of them lived, not surprising. I was wondering how many of our current crop of scientists believe not just in a supreme being, but in the literal interpretation of the Bible.
  5. Do you know how many scientists believe the Bible? Genuine question. I have no idea.
  6. It's so she doesn't have to go too far to set fire to some rich bastard's house the next time anyone upsets her.
  7. Well, they're all nuts but I see your point. Not taking some of them seriously can have serious consequences. You could lose your freedom. Or your head. And try mocking Haida or Rastafari beliefs, for instance, the same way people do Tom Cruise's, and see how far that gets you. Or those nutjobs that worship Prince Philip. I suppose they'll worship Charles now.
  8. Hahaha. Greta and AOC are gonna take all your money. Get used to it.
  9. Well, the idea that international cooperation is not possible is a given because global governance is not possible. And that's because international cooperation is not possible. We just aren't built that way. So you have nothing to worry about. That doesn't change the fact that climate change is real, human caused, and dangerous. That's what we were arguing about. At least you "guess" it might exist now.
  10. I'm no economist, so I don't know what "risk reward" is. And if I did, it wouldn't be my insurance scheme. As I've said, I don't think any of it is going to actually work without the kind of international cooperation we can't even dream about right now. That's why I like Canadian pipelines. If someone's going to buy it, it might as well be us who produces it and sells it. No, what I'm getting at is your notion that climate change might be real, best guess, and as long as you're ok, everyone else is too. If we are only worried about catastrophes, then sleep soundly. They aren't going
×
×
  • Create New...