Jump to content
Political Discussion Forums
Shady

The Truth About Benghazi

Recommended Posts

Beats me...I think Col. Oliver North was a god_amn American hero ! :D

Exactly. I'm not expecting you to be in front of the US embassy yelling "DOWN DOWN BUSH DOWN"

Clinton will be a viable prez candidate for her party if she chooses to run, and that means taking lots of heat over Benghazi.

I'm sure she wouldn't mind that. I don't think it's going to push the swing voters' swings much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

....I'm sure she wouldn't mind that. I don't think it's going to push the swing voters' swings much.

The statements and video from hearings are too much to ignore. It's Politics 101.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The statements and video from hearings are too much to ignore. It's Politics 101.

We're both trying to speculate as to what will "play" in Peoria, and if I had to bet on one of us, it'd be you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We're both trying to speculate as to what will "play" in Peoria, and if I had to bet on one of us, it'd be you.

It has already started.....

012413.jpg?w=620

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hillary obviously meant, what difference does it make if some Americans were killed in Benghazi. She doesn't care and that's why she must never become the president. What she really meant is that it doesn't ever make any difference if Americans were killed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, when it comes to the 2016 U.S. election, what difference does it make what Canadians think about Benghazi ?

It makes some difference, or you wouldn't be talking to us...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It makes some difference, or you wouldn't be talking to us...

It's all the same to the senior mocker/troller.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kimmy, that is like the police investigating themselves with the conclusion of everything being done within the law.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whatever really happened there, it happened on Clinton's watch. Plain and simple.

I dunno... Groups like the CIA and NSA are pretty much above any kind of civilian oversight. Its quite possible Clinton didnt even know the CIA was running a torture prison there. You have the pecking order backwards me thinks as far as who is watching who... they probably have a toilet cam in Hilarys bathroom.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kimmy, that is like the police investigating themselves with the conclusion of everything being done within the law.

Wrong, Gost. Nobody would like to nail the Obama administration more than the House Republicans.

That the House Committee didn't find any wrongdoing by the administration is more like Wiley Coyote investigating the Roadrunner and finding no wrondoing.

-k

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wrong, Gost. Nobody would like to nail the Obama administration more than the House Republicans.

That the House Committee didn't find any wrongdoing by the administration is more like Wiley Coyote investigating the Roadrunner and finding no wrondoing.

-k

When it comes to issues of national security and potential crimes by the state these guys collude more than Canadian Telecoms. I have no doubt if there was any wrongdoing it would be covered up and buried. It's so that nobody powerful ever gets prosecuted, and it's why Obama chose to 'look forward, not backwards' instead of prosecuting members of the Bush regime for their illegal war and torture.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dunno... Groups like the CIA and NSA are pretty much above any kind of civilian oversight. Its quite possible Clinton didnt even know the CIA was running a torture prison there. You have the pecking order backwards me thinks as far as who is watching who... they probably have a toilet cam in Hilarys bathroom.

I would argue that Clinton knew damn well what was really going on. The failed reason of the video first off, was a complete distraction they knew was shoddy at best. But they rolled with it. Clinton tried to distance herself, by leaving the State Department, this was before she was even asked to testify in the hearings. Hillary is at the top tier of the pecking order, no doubt. She has made herself quite valuable to the rest of the top tier. She will be rewarded with a presidency. That I am quite sure of.

'What difference does it make?' Is a telling statement, she knew what was really doing down. I am more concerned with the gun running through Libya to Syria. That was the real CIA operation there. That would have also exposed the USA a lot more. I mean complaining to Russia about their support for the rebels in Ukraine, but not even giving a nod to the support of the Libyan rebels, the Syrian Rebels, Al-Queda in the past and present, in the forms of the Muhajedeen and now ISIS. I can't say for sure that ISIS is backed by the CIA, but it would not surprise me.

Also allegations of human trafficking through Benghazi. Not sure who was in control of that operation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

'What difference does it make?' Is a telling statement, she knew what was really doing down. I am more concerned with the gun running through Libya to Syria. That was the real CIA operation there. That would have also exposed the USA a lot more. I mean complaining to Russia about their support for the rebels in Ukraine, but not even giving a nod to the support of the Libyan rebels, the Syrian Rebels, Al-Queda in the past and present, in the forms of the Muhajedeen and now ISIS. I can't say for sure that ISIS is backed by the CIA, but it would not surprise me.

Also allegations of human trafficking through Benghazi. Not sure who was in control of that operation.

The sad thing is the massive hypocrisy and intellectual dishonesty of Western politicians and media seems completely unnoticed by vast swathes of the population, especially in the US.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I note the Republicans deftly avoid the fact that 11 embassies and consulates were attacked, and a number of deaths occured, during Dubya's regime.

Do you consider embassies to be a military target?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...