Jump to content
Political Discussion Forums

Recommended Posts

Even though Gary Count Chocula Bettman tried to downplay expansion with a litany of caveats, the NHL will almost certainly expand in time for the 17-18 season. In a test season ticket sale in Las Vegas 13,500 seat deposits were collected in a short period of time, which is pretty good. The AEG/MGM partnership could certainly afford the half billion dollar expansion fee and an NHL club as an anchor tenant would help fill the gaps between concerts and big ticket fights at the arena already under construction. In my opinion, Vegas is a done deal so what will the club be called? The Outlaws name is perfect, but taken. Maybe revive the Las Vegas Posse? I think the Las Vegas Vagabonds, Las Vegas Lewd or Degenerate Hookers (Ho's for short. Go Ho's Go) could work.

I also think Phoenix will move to Quebec and a second new club will be added. I hear Seattle is in the running, but with an expansion fee of $500M or higher the smart move would be to add a second Toronto club. Thoughts?

Link to post
Share on other sites

What the league really needs to do is contract. There are already more teams than there are available NHL level players to fill those rosters.

I disagree with your assertion about NHL talent and besides the owners won't turn down a billion+ dollars. Watch some old games and you'll see a noticeable drop in both speed and athleticism every 5 years further back in time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thnk the main candidates right now are LV, Portland and Seattle. Portland has an arena and potential owner. If Seattle can get Tukwila approved they will more than likely have a team. To big of an actual hockey market to pass up.

Bettman has said before that no teams will ever relocate to another conference again. What that means for the coyotes remains to be seen.

Quebec has the arena and a buyer ready so its really up to the BoG to decide at this point.

Link to post
Share on other sites
I also think Phoenix will move to Quebec and a second new club will be added. I hear Seattle is in the running, but with an expansion fee of $500M or higher the smart move would be to add a second Toronto club. Thoughts?

I think $500m is very steep for a new NHL franchise.

The NHL does not want any relocations becuase the relocate fee is going to have to be a fraction of the new franchise fee- but most of all, players get a cut of the relocation money. The owners keep all the loot from a new franchise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think $500m is very steep for a new NHL franchise.

The NHL does not want any relocations becuase the relocate fee is going to have to be a fraction of the new franchise fee- but most of all, players get a cut of the relocation money. The owners keep all the loot from a new franchise.

It is steep especially considering most teams estimated values aren't even that high. That's that price of doing business with the NHL.

With this latest Glendale fiasco, and the fact that Bettman stated no team will move conferences, you can bet that Arizona will not be moving to Quebec.

Paul Allen of the Trailblazers has expressed interest awhile ago, although not very much. But he has plenty of money and an NHL ready arena with plenty of capacity in a City that could very easily have some hockey frenzied fans.

My guess is Arizona moves to Portland.

Las Vegas and Seattle get expansions.

Hopefully Florida moves to Quebec within the next few seasons.

Though I'm most likely wrong as there could be many unseen investors that come out within the next month or so.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The NHL is a business. There are currently 30 teams in the league. At a franchise fee of $500 million, each owner will receive over $16 million back on his investment. If two new teams are allowed in then these 30 owners will get $33 million apiece for doing absolutely nothing. Not a bad way of making money.

As to the product - the level of play and competition to thrill the average fan?

Who cares. Fans are not too bright as has been seen over the years with strikes and other distractions. They will bitch and complain and then come back and continue to pay a weeks pay for a seat.

The NHL is a business. A very successful business.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The NHL is a business. There are currently 30 teams in the league. At a franchise fee of $500 million, each owner will receive over $16 million back on his investment. If two new teams are allowed in then these 30 owners will get $33 million apiece for doing absolutely nothing. Not a bad way of making money.

As to the product - the level of play and competition to thrill the average fan?

Who cares. Fans are not too bright as has been seen over the years with strikes and other distractions. They will bitch and complain and then come back and continue to pay a weeks pay for a seat.

The NHL is a business. A very successful business.

It's midly successful. Compared to where it should be at this point. I mean they have a pretty long string of busts since Bettman. The game is basically growing itself in Canada. In the US... well they managed to get California on board more than likely because those teams are winning championships and being competative.

Florida, Carolina, Columbus, Arizona, Tamp Bay, St. Louis, New York Islanders and the New Jersey Devils have all been operating at a loss in recent years. Their owners getting expansion money might be the only way they hold off on selling. well except that guy that owns Carolina, he just pumps more and more money into that team... I'd hate to be his accountent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The gambling is the biggest issue with Las Vegas, and how you feel about the potential for that screwing up the NHL. A hockey team in the desert is a stupid idea. But a hockey team in a desert with no other professional sports teams might be the lucky kind of stupid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Las Vegas has a metro area population of over 2,000,000 people, larger than all Canadian metro areas except for Toronto, Montreal, and Vancouver. Plus it has far more tourist visitors each year with disposable income.

I've seen some pretty fair arguments that Saskatchewan could support a team before Las Vegas.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many players do not want to go to such small markets. To some people, Las Vegas is far more appealing than Saskatchewan.

That may be true but there seems to be a higher correlation with players wanting to play for teams that can compete. If you can remain competative you can attract players far easier than if you have nice weather, like Florida. Its the small markets with the most ravenous fans. Corey Perry, who plays for Anaheim, said he's never played in a building as loud as the MTS centre in Winnipeg during the playoffs. Anaheim doesn't get that,even in the playoffs. Winnipeg gets it on a nightly basis.

Edited by PrimeNumber
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Similar Content

    • By Zeitgeist
      For 40 years Canadians have seen the NHL expand into US markets where the locals have little interest in hockey.  We understand that in some cases this has been a good thing for hockey, expanding interest in the sport and creating new hockey markets.  We also understand that sometimes the local Canadian hockey market couldn’t afford to support the team, as was the case briefly in Winnipeg and Quebec, mainly due to the currency exchange rate.  However, hockey markets like Montreal and especially Toronto are starving for additional NHL teams.  Toronto could easily support an additional two teams, probably one west of the city and one to the north.  
      NHL Commissioner Gary Betman shut down expansion into Toronto when investors wanted to move the money losing Phoenix Coyotes to Toronto.  Betman would rather prop up money losing US teams than add teams in markets where people love hockey and would fill seats in arenas.  Yes there are US expansion success stories, such as Nashville, but it’s ridiculous that teams like the Florida Panthers should exist while Toronto has only one NHL team.  The city of Toronto is now bigger than the city of Chicago, which has two Major League Baseball teams.  If Chicago can support two baseball teams, surely Toronto can support two hockey teams.  
    • By Exegesisme
      1 My Exegesis of Gravitational Constant, Aether, Dark Matter and Dark Energy, My Scientific Work​
      By exegesisme
      1, Gravitational constant G, is not a constant. It just reveals the property of the local space in which it had been measured. Its whole physical meaning is the accelerating contract rate of the local space under the action of one kilogram mass.
      2, The many measured numbers are the almost same which only means the local spaces in which they are measured share almost the same property, but not every local space shares almost the same property.
      3, Why can the mass even as small as one kilogram cause the contraction of the space? My answer is, there are very evenly distributed mass in the local space, the gravity between the mass and the local space with the evenly distributed mass cause the contraction of the local space.
      4, The evenly distributed mass is only even at the same distance from a dominating large mass such as Earth, and is different at different distance. The evenly distributed mass is denser at a nearer distance than a longer distance, so the gravitational constant G is smaller at a nearer distance than at a longer distance, for the nearer local space with the denser evenly distributing mass is harder to contract under the action of one kilogram mass.
      5, The experimental physicists are very easy to prove my exegesis, as long as the distance or height between any two measurements is large enough to make the difference of G can be measured by the method they choose.
      6, The fact is, although very large masses in our universe, our universe still is in accelerating expansion, why? The reason is, the evenly distributed mass is very small particles, these particles are with holy elasticity and have a random movement, which provides pressure against gravity to make our universe expanse. The force for the universal expansion is a new fundamental force, and also is responsible for the big bang. Other four basic forces can be unified as gravity, so, our universe has only two fundamental forces.
      7, This substance is the holy substance Aristotle once assumed. The holy substance with very subtle mixed magnetism is also the media for the field of macro electromagnetism, and even the media for gravity of all masses.
      8, The Michelson-Morley experiment is wrong of their experimental hypothesis, and is also wrong of their explanation of the experimental result on their wrong hypothesis. The holy substance is absorbed by every mass which human can measure, and is relatively still to the mass. Earth too absorbs the holy substance around. Earth moves with the absorbed holy substance, so they did not observed a relative motion between the holy substance and Earth. The speed of light did not change which just mean there is not relative motion between the holy substance and Earth.
      9, The holy substance is also the material to form the charge of electron and positive electron, and can move with electron as electron moves, which is the reason of the waving phenomena of electrons and other micro particles.
      10, The holy substance is both dark energy and dark matter, is the reason of the theory of relativity, and has many other properties and functions. The size of its particles is much smaller than the Planck's magnitudes.
    • By Rupert S. Lander
      A simple proposition:
      Since Bill C-290 has been overwhelmingly passed by the democratically elected House of Commons but stalled by the unelected Senate, and since C-290 only seeks to repeal a section of the Criminal Code of Canada and does not seek to add or amend any paragraph to the CCC, therefore, should C-290 be defeated or die on the order paper when Stephen Harper has the Governor General prorogue Parliament later this year, then:
      - would the Prime Minister be justfied of he were to advise the GG to use the Royal Prerogative of Mercy to extend a general amnesty that would grant unconditional immunity from prosecution to any party that may contravene Paragraph 207(4)b of the CCC, either now or in the future?
      - and if the GG issued such an amnesty, would that amnesty for all intents and purposes have the same legal effects as Bill C-290?
      I believe the answer to both questions is yes.
    • By Mighty AC
      Now that hockey is back I feel like pontificating on how we could make the game better. In your opinion, what changes or tweaks would improve the game?
      I have several ideas but I'll start with two:
      1) Division winners should not be guaranteed a top 3 playoff seeding, just a playoff spot.
      2) If we're sticking with this conference layout for now then I think the top 3 teams in each conference should be able to choose their first round playoff opponent. First place chooses their preferred opponent in the bottom 4, followed by second and third place. I think it will make the regular season a little more meaningful.
  • Tell a friend

    Love Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
×
×
  • Create New...