Jump to content
Political Discussion Forums

Gay Pride Parades are now 'expressions of pure racism'


Recommended Posts

Yes, in the upside-down progressive land known as Sweden, gay pride parades are now 'expressions of pure racism' by 'xenophobic far-right nationalists'. I wonder how long before Canada and other Western countries adopt this view.

http://www.blazingcatfur.ca/2015/07/21/sweden-democrats-plan-gay-pride-parade-through-muslim-areas-leftists-and-gay-rights-groups-decry-the-parade-as-racist/

I suggest you read the article. I'll just give a few parts of it here:

"On July 29, a gay pride parade is scheduled in Sweden. But, you see, this is no ordinary gay pride parade. The parade is scheduled to go through Tensta and Husby – two areas where Muslim immigrants are more than 75% of the population."

"The Facebook page is absolutely filled with angry comments from leftists, attacking the “xenophobic right-wing nationalists” for organizing a gay pride parade through Muslim areas. Since Islam holds that gays should be executed, something like this is obviously an attack on Muslims and should therefore be outlawed. At least, that’s what Swedish leftists – and, indeed, Swedish gays – are saying.

Leftists are organizing a counter-demonstration against this gay pride parade."

Link to post
Share on other sites

The obsession with fairness, and equality are unrealistic. Because good and evil are not universal forces in a binary way. They are relative to ourselves. Our whole moral system is based on a logical fallacy. That good and evil exist as a absolute force.

This is what will lead us to these strange situation.

Some have declared that Islam is incompatible with western civilization because of this. The problem lies in a illogical flaw in our moral legal system.

Edited by Freddy
Link to post
Share on other sites

The obsession with fairness, and equality are unrealistic. Because good and evil are not universal forces in a binary way. They are relative to ourselves. Our whole moral system is based on a logical fallacy. That good and evil exist as a absolute force.

This is what will lead us to these strange situation.

Some have declared that Islam is incompatible with western civilization because of this. The problem lies in a illogical flaw in our moral legal system.

Interesting. Explain further. Especially the last sentence. What is the "illogical flaw"?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting. Explain further. Especially the last sentence. What is the "illogical flaw"?

.

Our whole Juridical & moral system is based on the idea of ultimate good and ultimate evil as in God/Devil. Like its two absolute force of nature.

We are looking at good and evil as if it were binary and universal, when it's actually very relative to many different situations and people.

This is what's causing all the illogical running around with our heads cut off, that this thread talks about.

Because there is no such thing as ultimate good or ultimate evil, in this universe. Good and bad only exist relatively to something.

Something may be good for me, and evil for someone else.

Because we live in our own minds, it's easy to see good and evil as a binary thing, because good and evil is binary in our own mind, as its relative to ourselves.

But it isn't binary to the universe.

And that's the flaw that makes us think illogically. Because we can't see the bigger picture. We only see it as good for me or bad for me. Or good for us/bad for us.

We're trying to make sense of the universe while staring straight at our naval like its the ultimate source of what is right and what is wrong.

Try to ponder. What if we were telepathic with all living things, and how that, would change our view of the universe.

Edited by Freddy
Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess I must be one of these evil 'xenophobic right-wing nationalists' since I support gay rights and think gay people shouldn't be killed for being gay.

I also support freedom of speech and don't think that apostates should be killed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A group of conservatives

I don't think that the Swedish democrats can be accurately described as conservatives. Classical liberal is far closer.

No passive-aggression here.

Couldn't any gay pride parade be considered passive-aggressive to some group?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think that the Swedish democrats can be accurately described as conservatives. Classical liberal is far closer.

blazingcatfur! Oh my, nice source! Classical liberal??? Oh really!

it's your source that states: "This gay pride parade was created by Jan Sjunnesson, former editor-in-chief for the Samtiden newspaper in Sweden, which is owned by the nationalist Sweden Democrats party (for our Canadian readers, think of the Sweden Democrats as being kind of like the Conservatives which means that they’re considered “extreme far-right” in Sweden)."

wiki states: "The Sweden Democrats or Swedish Democrats (Swedish: Sverigedemokraterna, SD) are a far-right, right-wing populist, and anti-immigration political party in Sweden that was founded in 1988. The party describes itself as social conservative with a nationalist foundation."

BBC - Profile: Far-right Sweden Democrats

what's this... oh my! Stockholm Pride bars Sweden Democrats ... now that kinda messes with your OP, hey!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess I must be one of these evil 'xenophobic right-wing nationalists' since I support gay rights and think gay people shouldn't be killed for being gay.

I also support freedom of speech and don't think that apostates should be killed.

Nah, you're just super gullible, just like the leftists protesting this stunt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it's your source that states: "This gay pride parade was created by Jan Sjunnesson, former editor-in-chief for the Samtiden newspaper in Sweden, which is owned by the nationalist Sweden Democrats party (for our Canadian readers, think of the Sweden Democrats as being kind of like the Conservatives which means that they’re considered “extreme far-right” in Sweden)."

Do you not see the quotation marks? They are considered 'extreme far-right'. That doesn't mean they are 'extreme far-right'.

wiki states: "The Sweden Democrats or Swedish Democrats (Swedish: Sverigedemokraterna, SD) are a far-right, right-wing populist, and anti-immigration political party in Sweden that was founded in 1988. The party describes itself as social conservative with a nationalist foundation."

Yes, they were conservative in 1988. That was 27 years ago. I'm not sure if the conservative label accurate describes them today though.

Using BBC to determine what is 'far-right' or not. You amuse me Waldo.

Yes, many people in Sweden take the view that either you are a hardcore socialist, or you are a nazi.

Edited by -1=e^ipi
Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyway, I guess Richard Dawkins must also be a far-right nationalist xenophobe racist as well.

http://www.blazingcatfur.ca/2015/07/25/richard-dawkins-supports-pride-jarva-calls-the-swedish-left-pathetic/

All part of the weird overlap of the atheist/GamorGator/gynophobe/racist/anime enthusiast communities.

Edited by Black Dog
Link to post
Share on other sites

The far-right seems to be willing to defend groups that they recently hated, in order to propagate hate against newer groups... as evidenced on here by far-right posters ostensibly befriending Israel. It's not a principled reaction to game your scape-goating, but there you are...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems pretty legit. A group of conservatives plan a route for a gay parade to go through an area that is 75% Muslim.

No passive-aggression here. No siree.

Riiight, and if this 'conservative' group organized the gay pride parade and deliberately kept it away from areas where there were religious Christians you'd be bemoaning the fact they were 'hiding' the gay pride parade away so as to not offend those vile Christians.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Riiight, and if this 'conservative' group organized the gay pride parade and deliberately kept it away from areas where there were religious Christians you'd be bemoaning the fact they were 'hiding' the gay pride parade away so as to not offend those vile Christians.

Once you accommodate one , you have to accommodate all. Soon your life is planed around accommodating everything.

Can we start accommodating me for the fact I no longer want to accommodate anyone?

Edited by Freddy
Link to post
Share on other sites

Riiight, and if this 'conservative' group organized the gay pride parade and deliberately kept it away from areas where there were religious Christians you'd be bemoaning the fact they were 'hiding' the gay pride parade away so as to not offend those vile Christians.

Social conservatives in the west are typically Christian and not Muslim so yes, it would stand that their motives would be different if they avoided a Christian neighbourhood vs. routing through a Muslim neighbourhood.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Social conservatives in the west are typically Christian and not Muslim so yes, it would stand that their motives would be different if they avoided a Christian neighbourhood vs. routing through a Muslim neighbourhood.

That doesn't follow. Maybe some people just support gay rights and don't care who is offended by that, be they Christian, Muslim or Pastafarian.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Similar Content

    • By Zeitgeist
      https://www.mississauga.com/news-story/10017802-online-petition-calls-for-renaming-of-winston-churchill-boulevard-in-mississauga/
       
      So, the first leader to declare war on Hitler and Nazism is under fire with calls to change the name of Sir Winston Churchill Blvd. Thoughts?
    • By Zeitgeist
      With all of the accusations of systemic racism, including the idea of unconscious bias, some companies are implementing affirmative action hiring policies that will aim to hire more minorities.  The CBC, for example, claims it will make sure at least 50% of its workforce are minorities.  Do you agree with affirmative action policies?
    • By Hussain
      I had the privilege of interviewing MP Mark Holland on issues facing Canada from Clean drinking water in Indengoues reserves, Coronavirus outbreak, Affordable housing, and Wexit Canada.
      You can watch it on youtube Monday 2:15 p.m EST 
      BUT What do you think are the top 5 issues in Canada?
      Follow me on IG @t.w.t_podcast_
       
    • By Scott Mayers
      A news conference was just held now on the news of Indigenous people declaring war on us all for the "not guilty" verdict of Gerald Stanley. See  http://thestarphoenix.com/news/local-news/gerald-stanley-trial-jury-delivers-not-guilty-verdict-in-murder-of-colten-boushie
      and present news coverage tonight (10:45 Global news and likely on CBC network now). 
      I've always understood our government's stance of "Mutliculturalism" (TM) to represent collective forms of National Socialists and NOT diversity of all peoples. In the need for the establishment of this country's faltering power to preserve their own Nationalistic 'catholic' origins here, Pierre Trudeau set up a Constitution that locked in his favored religion and culture but had to include token means to the very Aboriginal tribes his (not my) relatives thought of the Natives when they abused them through various policies of their own ancestors. 
      I believe the means of 'favoring' the Aboriginals the WAY we have in this country today goes along with the similar movements to grant women and girls retribution against the problems ...that again....his own kind of family and thinkers created. Yet to do so means to TRANSFER the burden to all people and especially to those very stereotypical thinking memes against SCAPEGOATS of the whole rather than take on the burden of debt that is due against the churches and wealthy establishment of the Eastern Canadian Catholic and Anglican 'loyalists' that served to go against the democratic changes of the Enlightenment when the U.S. was being formed. 
      My anger here is to what this conference of "Nations" (Aboriginal Nationalists) are challenging of many across the nation now against the trial that "let a guilty man free" today. [I don't hold any opinion for Gerald Stanley's guilt nor innocence, only the FACT that he's been tried by a jury of his peers as we are all expected a right here to.] The rise of Nationalism by the Natives now is something that I fear is going to harm us all in kind to all the other segregate empowered groups being fostered by Mutliculturalism. [Remember, the Nazis in Germany is precisely a motion of "Indigenous" Germans demanding SEGREGATE social rights as 'distinct' special peoples!.]
      History is not only repeating itself,...it is getting amplified for the sake of the selfish arrogance and ignorance of those supporting SEGREGATE laws for SPECIFIC people as though they are above and beyond reproach. 
      I was born on this EARTH and so am equally "Aboriginal" here. I also have NOT gained any of the wealth nor benefits of anyone here, including no favor to high paying jobs that I get stereotyped as having gained from. I am a "FLOATER" when it comes to the fact that I don't own shit nor any privileged "culture" that I supposedly OWN from some ancestors of mine. This is MY land as much as any others here. And I'm getting tired of this EMPOWERMENT to National Socialism in the name of "liberalism" of a left that is actually the collective right-wingers AVENGING W.A.S.P.s that I also DO NOT SUPPORT!!
      Thank you Trudeau and all you who support SEGREGATIONIST, racist and sexist laws here. Thank you for the inevitable wars that YOU are actually fostering of the very people you claim to be pitying. 
       
      P.S. "Person Kind" comes from the meaning "per son" (for each SON); So if you were intending to evade any sexist overtones of the word "Mankind" you think it has, Justine, think again. [This is a dig to his comment the other day correcting some girl who used this.]
    • By drummindiver
      The author of this article states this succinctly,   and I agree.  These books hilight the evils of racism,  and banning them due to their use of racial slurs is counter productive. 
      ANY thoughts?
      http://www.dailywire.com/news/11275/leftists-virginia-ban-kill-mockingbird-huck-finn-ben-shapiro
  • Tell a friend

    Love Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
×
×
  • Create New...