Jump to content
Political Discussion Forums
socialist

Ashley Madison Data Dump

Recommended Posts

This is too funny.

Dozens of Manitoba government, City of Winnipeg emails part of Ashley Madison data dump.

Honestly, why would you use your government email to register on a site like this. Government employees should be working, not searching the internet for affairs. Another example of taxpayers dollars hard at work.

http://globalnews.ca/news/2174780/dozens-of-manitoba-government-city-of-winnipeg-emails-part-of-ashley-madison-data-dump/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's been over nine years of conservatives slowly cutting budgets to these kinds of useless departments. We could use a other 20 years and we would still only be starting to make a difference. Good reason to keep voting conservatives for the rest of my life.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My favorite news from the Ashley Madison hack is that family values activist Josh Duggar had an Ashley Madison account!

http://gawker.com/family-values-activist-josh-duggar-had-a-paid-ashley-ma-1725132091

Dude blew $1000 at Ashley Madison during the same time frame he was working as Executive Director of the Family Research Council, a major US lobby group that spends most of its time complaining that liberal values are destroying families.

Josh doesn't need liberal values to destroy marriages, he just needs his credit card. As a devout and extremely vocal Christian, Josh fully endorses the power of prayer; no doubt "dear God, please don't let my wife find out" is high on the list of things he prays for.

Josh's turn-ons include:

“Conventional Sex,” Experimenting with Sex Toys,” One-Night Stands,” “Open to Experimentation,” “Gentleness,” “Good With Your Hands,” Sensual Massage,” “Extended Foreplay/Teasing,” “Bubble Bath for 2,” “Likes to Give Oral Sex,” “Likes to Receive Oral Sex,” “Someone I Can Teach,” “Someone Who Can Teach Me,” “Kissing,” “Cuddling & Hugging,” “Sharing Fantasies,” “Sex Talk.”

Josh's turn-ons include:

“A Professional/Well Groomed,” “Stylish/Classy,” “Casual Jeans/T-shirt Type,” “Muscular/Fit Body,” ”Petite Figure,” “Tall Height,” “Short Height,” “Long Hair,””Short Hair,” “Girl Next Door,” “Naughty Girl,” “Sense of Humor,” “Imagination,” “Creative and Adventurous,” “Relaxed and Easy Going,” “Aggressive/Take Charge Nature,” “Confidence,” “Discretion/Secrecy,” “A Good Listener,” “Good Personal Hygiene,” “Average Sex Drive,” “High Sex Drive,” “Dislikes Routine,” “Has a Secret Love Nest,” “Disease Free,” “Drug Free,” and “Natural Breasts.”

Of course, Josh already got fired from Family Research Council after it became public knowledge that he molested girls (including his sisters) when he was a teenager. It's not like there's much more damage to his reputation that can be done at this point. But it does kind of demonstrate what a load of horse crap it was when he was talking about how after his molesting days he got in touch with Big Baby Jesus and prayed until he was all Godly again. Guess that didn't take. I'm sure more prayer and reflection will be had in coming days.

-k

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My favorite news from the Ashley Madison hack is that family values activist Josh Duggar had an Ashley Madison account!

http://gawker.com/family-values-activist-josh-duggar-had-a-paid-ashley-ma-1725132091

Dude blew $1000 at Ashley Madison during the same time frame he was working as Executive Director of the Family Research Council, a major US lobby group that spends most of its time complaining that liberal values are destroying families.

Josh doesn't need liberal values to destroy marriages, he just needs his credit card. As a devout and extremely vocal Christian, Josh fully endorses the power of prayer; no doubt "dear God, please don't let my wife find out" is high on the list of things he prays for.

Josh's turn-ons include:

Josh's turn-ons include:

Of course, Josh already got fired from Family Research Council after it became public knowledge that he molested girls (including his sisters) when he was a teenager. It's not like there's much more damage to his reputation that can be done at this point. But it does kind of demonstrate what a load of horse crap it was when he was talking about how after his molesting days he got in touch with Big Baby Jesus and prayed until he was all Godly again. Guess that didn't take. I'm sure more prayer and reflection will be had in coming days.

-k

While I think everyone is in agreement that this guy is bad news, I find it a tad exploitive and kind of paparazzi style to reprint info that was obtained through hackers. It's discerning to view someone's profile on an adult site that was targeted to consenting adults and being copied on a forum. Do we really need to know his turn ons etc. he is not an elected official. Are Canadians just jumping on the bandwagon of American reporting. Do we really need to know about this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While I think everyone is in agreement that this guy is bad news, I find it a tad exploitive and kind of paparazzi style to reprint info that was obtained through hackers. It's discerning to view someone's profile on an adult site that was targeted to consenting adults and being copied on a forum. Do we really need to know his turn ons etc. he is not an elected official. Are Canadians just jumping on the bandwagon of American reporting. Do we really need to know about this?

Josh Duggar (as well as the rest of his family to lesser or greater extent) have built fame and fortune attacking the librerals and the gays for destroying America's families and molesting children. So what does he do in his spare time? He destroys his own family and molests his little sisters.

I don't care what people do in their own time... unless it's a direct contradiction of policy that they're trying to advance in the public sphere. At that point, their flaming hypocrisy becomes a matter for public discussion. I don't even care where the information came from. "hey, you guys weren't supposed to find out about that" isn't a defense.

I realize that this was supposed to be about City of Winnipeg employees and that Josh Duggar is completely off topic, but at least I didn't bring Caitlyn Jenner into it, and since I didn't call anybody a troglodyte I'm sure Charles will be ok with it.

-k

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My issue is that information is being reposted from hackers from a legitimate site. It doesn't matter who the member is. The fact you are reposting info from a private member is the issue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My favorite news from the Ashley Madison hack is that family values activist Josh Duggar had an Ashley Madison account!

http://gawker.com/family-values-activist-josh-duggar-had-a-paid-ashley-ma-1725132091

Dude blew $1000 at Ashley Madison during the same time frame he was working as Executive Director of the Family Research Council, a major US lobby group that spends most of its time complaining that liberal values are destroying families.

Josh doesn't need liberal values to destroy marriages, he just needs his credit card. As a devout and extremely vocal Christian, Josh fully endorses the power of prayer; no doubt "dear God, please don't let my wife find out" is high on the list of things he prays for.

Josh's turn-ons include:

Josh's turn-ons include:

Of course, Josh already got fired from Family Research Council after it became public knowledge that he molested girls (including his sisters) when he was a teenager. It's not like there's much more damage to his reputation that can be done at this point. But it does kind of demonstrate what a load of horse crap it was when he was talking about how after his molesting days he got in touch with Big Baby Jesus and prayed until he was all Godly again. Guess that didn't take. I'm sure more prayer and reflection will be had in coming days.

-k

Pretty low of you, Kimmy. Actually, it's disgusting....him and you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My issue is that information is being reposted from hackers from a legitimate site. It doesn't matter who the member is. The fact you are reposting info from a private member is the issue.

He's a public figure, the information is out there, and the sensitive stuff like his personal contact information and credit card number is redacted, so I don't see the issue.

Pretty low of you, Kimmy. Actually, it's disgusting....him and you.

Hey, have you become a social conservative as well as a fiscal conservative? Did your recent life-changing experience also turn you into a Family Values guy?

-k

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope they find whoever released all this information, and throw them in jail for 10+ years.

Releasing all this private information of millions of law abiding citizens is terrible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They were probably just trying to protect us from terrorists, e^pi*i. Nothing to worry about!

-k

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My issue is that information is being reposted from hackers from a legitimate site. It doesn't matter who the member is. The fact you are reposting info from a private member is the issue.

I'm torn... particularly since I expect it was 'the gays' that drove Duggar to seek 'relief' from that site! I kid, I kid!

taken to a broader level, how does one view the publication of emails/information hacked by political/ideological driven "whistle-blowers"... see WikiLeaks/Manning-Assange, NSA/Snowden, etc.. In this particular case, there's that saying, "mess with the bulls, expect the horns".

it's easy to look at persons with a public profile and showcase/snicker when their hypocrisy is highlighted... it's another thing to appreciate this can... this will... impact spouses and families of "just folks". That information will be out there, but the "just folks" won't have that info splashed across the likes of Gawker; albeit, there may be more interest now from spouses of Manitoba/Winnipeg government workers!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ashley Madison has been doing immense social good by weakening gender roles and the institution of marriage. It is a shame that this had to happen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm torn... particularly since I expect it was 'the gays' that drove Duggar to seek 'relief' from that site! I kid, I kid!

taken to a broader level, how does one view the publication of emails/information hacked by political/ideological driven "whistle-blowers"... see WikiLeaks/Manning-Assange, NSA/Snowden, etc.. In this particular case, there's that saying, "mess with the bulls, expect the horns".

it's easy to look at persons with a public profile and showcase/snicker when their hypocrisy is highlighted... it's another thing to appreciate this can... this will... impact spouses and families of "just folks". That information will be out there, but the "just folks" won't have that info splashed across the likes of Gawker; albeit, there may be more interest now from spouses of Manitoba/Winnipeg government workers!

And of course, I thought of that too Waldo. I sometimes think that Snowden deserves a Pulitzer prize. However, that is far different from what is being uncovered on an Ashley site.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He's a public figure, the information is out there, and the sensitive stuff like his personal contact information and credit card number is redacted, so I don't see the issue.

Hey, have you become a social conservative as well as a fiscal conservative? Did your recent life-changing experience also turn you into a Family Values guy?

-k

Does anyone care about his cc info? Probably not so it doesn't matter that it was redacted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He's a public figure, the information is out there, and the sensitive stuff like his personal contact information and credit card number is redacted, so I don't see the issue.

Hey, have you become a social conservative as well as a fiscal conservative? Did your recent life-changing experience also turn you into a Family Values guy?

-k

Social Con? No? But you singling out one individual for the purpose of ridicule is low and intolerant. I would say the person you ridiculed, whom I've never heard of, has some serious problems. It's sad that you revel in someone else's misery. It says much about your own self righteous insecurities.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And of course, I thought of that too Waldo. I sometimes think that Snowden deserves a Pulitzer prize. However, that is far different from what is being uncovered on an Ashley site.

Why? Snowden's releases put people in danger. No matter what you think of government spying you cannot dismiss the consequences. Who knows what he gave the Russians in return for asylum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The person is a holier than thou 'moral crusader' who no surprise turns out to be a molestor and sex fiend to boot. If the truth gets out from his own stupidity is it any surprise?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why? Snowden's releases put people in danger.

Example?

-k

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Social Con? No? But you singling out one individual for the purpose of ridicule is low and intolerant. I would say the person you ridiculed, whom I've never heard of, has some serious problems. It's sad that you revel in someone else's misery. It says much about your own self righteous insecurities.

I don't think it has anything to do with Kimmy's self righteous insecurities, but I think it does have to do with the general publication of information that we really have no business knowing. We know what a scumbag he was. That was self evident with the information that was presented but to display information that was shared on a site for consenting adults seems really tacky and icky (to quote bc_chick).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why? Snowden's releases put people in danger. No matter what you think of government spying you cannot dismiss the consequences. Who knows what he gave the Russians in return for asylum.

What information did he give to the Russians?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And of course, I thought of that too Waldo. I sometimes think that Snowden deserves a Pulitzer prize. However, that is far different from what is being uncovered on an Ashley site.

If Joe or Suzie from Winnipeg had accounts at Ashley Madison, I really couldn't care less. But we're talking about a guy who worked as executive director for a political action lobby group whose focus is demonizing liberals and gay people for "destroying families".

-k

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What information did he give to the Russians?

The Sunday Times reports that Russia and China decrypted files stolen by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden, forcing the UK intelligence service, MI6, to pull officers out of live operations in hostile countries.

http://www.businessinsider.com/snowden-russia-china-and-nsa-files-2015-6

Snowden, of course, denies it but the Russians are not sheltering him out the goodness of their hearts. He gave the material they wanted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Joe or Suzie from Winnipeg had accounts at Ashley Madison, I really couldn't care less. But we're talking about a guy who worked as executive director for a political action lobby group whose focus is demonizing liberals and gay people for "destroying families".

-k

And I agree that he is the scum of the planet, however, he signed up to this site, with fully consenting adults. This isn't about him on a personal level, it's a far wider issue. What about privacy issues? Is there a threshold that we cross to expose individuals to behaviour that we don't approve of? You exposed his behaviour because of his U.S. connections. Where do we draw the line?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Joe or Suzie from Winnipeg had accounts at Ashley Madison, I really couldn't care less. But we're talking about a guy who worked as executive director for a political action lobby group whose focus is demonizing liberals and gay people for "destroying families".

-k

You do a fair bit of demonizing toward those who disagree with your socialist progressive views. But you're full of your own style of self-righteousness. One of the reasons I changed from my socialist progressive views was because of hypocrites like you. Your own side is as hateful and intolerant of the other side, as much as you claim the other side is intolerant of your favourite flavour of the month.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ashley Madison has been doing immense social good by weakening gender roles and the institution of marriage. It is a shame that this had to happen.

Your not a fan of the institution of marriage? Why not?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...