Jump to content
Political Discussion Forums

The Reunion of Faith and Science, Creation and Evolution


Recommended Posts

The Reunion of Faith and Science, Creation and Evolution​

By Exegesisme

I do believe that Bible is a book about facts of body, emotion, soul, mind and spirit. Nowadays, a human understands bible in very narrow way which causes conflicts between faith and science, creation and evolution. This is false of human.

To my understanding, Darwin was just unknowingly in the grace of God and found the real way through which God created everything. The only difference between the Bible and the theory of Darwin is that Bible is about the knowledge of everything, and the theory of Darwin is about the knowledge from human thinking in a very limited domain and on very limited facts in that domain.

If we understand Bible with open mind, we can explain everything on Bible that today science can explain. However, the authorities of religions persist their explanations, which make all major conflicts between faith and science, creation and evolution. We should learn from Newton, do more job on the reunion of faith and science, creation and evolution, And do not learn anything from Kant, he was a man who was arrogantly to limit the domain of God, and to open the door for human demon.

Edited by Exegesisme
Link to post
Share on other sites

The Reunion of Faith and Science, Creation and Evolution​

By Exegesisme

I do believe that Bible is a book about facts of body, emotion, soul, mind and spirit. Nowadays, a human understands bible in very narrow way which causes conflicts between faith and science, creation and evolution. This is false of human.

To my understanding, Darwin was just unknowingly in the grace of God and found the real way through which God created everything. The only difference between the Bible and the theory of Darwin is that Bible is about the knowledge of everything, and the theory of Darwin is about the knowledge from human thinking in a very limited domain and on very limited facts in that domain.

If we understand Bible with open mind, we can explain everything on Bible that today science can explain. However, the authorities of religions persist their explanations, which make all major conflicts between faith and science, creation and evolution. We should learn from Newton, do more job on the reunion of faith and science, creation and evolution, And do not learn anything from Kant, he was a man who was arrogantly to limit the domain of God, and to open the door for human demon.

Or admit to ourselves this whole God thing was a whole lot of BS. Just because we have the ability to imagine something like God, doesn't make it reality.

I can imagine we are a cancer inside of a much bigger living being. The same way cancers exist as much smaller beings inside of our body. Doesn't make it reality. It makes it a possibility.

Deciding to have faith in someone's imaginary idea of a ultimate being of good, Like god, relative to ourselves. Is a perfect example of egocentric simplicity. It is a very limited opinion, and shows humans are not very intelligent after all, when you factor in the fact most humans believe it.

As soon as we break free of the very limited opinion that what humans consider to be good or bad is the central most important matter in the universe, and look at the bigger picture. It's easy to realize what a bunch of idiots humans really are as our whole civilization is based on a illogical flawed egocentric ideology of ultimate good based on our relativity.

Edited by Freddy
Link to post
Share on other sites

Or admit to ourselves this whole God thing was a whole lot of BS. Just because we have the ability to imagine something like God, doesn't make it reality.

I can imagine we are a cancer inside of a much bigger living being. The same way cancers exist as much smaller beings inside of our body. Doesn't make it reality. It makes it a possibility.

Deciding to have faith in someone's imaginary idea of a ultimate being of good, Like god, relative to ourselves. Is a perfect example of egocentric simplicity. It is a very limited opinion, and shows humans are not very intelligent after all, when you factor in the fact most humans believe it.

As soon as we break free of the very limited opinion that what humans consider to be good or bad is the central most important matter in the universe, and look at the bigger picture. It's easy to realize what a bunch of idiots humans really are as our whole civilization is based on a illogical flawed egocentric ideology of ultimate good based on our relativity.

In eye of God, what you said define you ultimately in a way you do not know, not "we". What I said define me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In eye of God, what you said define you ultimately in a way you do not know, not "we". What I said define me.

Your allowed to live in denial, especially if it helps you sleep at night. Your the lucky one. I'll accept the truth.

Edited by Freddy
Link to post
Share on other sites

Your allowed to live in denial, especially if it helps you sleep at night. Your the lucky one. I'll accept the truth.

You can not call what you said is truth.

Although sometimes I also use the word truth, as I use it, I always mean that my opinion of truth. My basic attitude is that all my words are my opinions on the beings I want to express. I try to look for truth, and communicate with people about what I see in the process, I can not make sure what I see is exactly the truth. If you argue with me what is exactly the truth, I can only tell you that out of my ability.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can not call what you said is truth.

Although sometimes I also use the word truth, as I use it, I always mean that my opinion of truth. My basic attitude is that all my words are my opinions on the beings I want to express. I try to look for truth, and communicate with people about what I see in the process, I can not make sure what I see is exactly the truth. If you argue with me what is exactly the truth, I can only tell you that out of my ability.

But the whole pointe of my example is that, I no longer see the cancers that may be inside of us as bad, or good. I've broken threw that limited view of our universe. I see the bigger picture while you are still looking at the universe from a flawed illogical egocentric foundation of what's good or bad relative to yourself, as if it was the ultimate truth of the universe. Edited by Freddy
Link to post
Share on other sites

But the whole pointe of my example is that, I no longer see the cancers that may be inside of us as bad, or good. I've broken threw that limited view of our universe. I see the bigger picture while you are still looking at the universe from a flawed illogical egocentric foundation of what's good or bad relative to yourself, as if it was the ultimate truth of the universe.

Your fate is a human, no matter how arrogant you are. Your human nature will teach you now and then that you are not the universe. You neutralize a huge pain only as you do not suffer from it, you have to deal with it as you actually suffer from it.

Edited by Exegesisme
Link to post
Share on other sites

Why think of God(s)? If such an entity exists then we are integral to it, albeit, an infinitesimally tiny piece. If we are an expression of God through creation then what need have we to contemplate it? What need does God have for our contemplation? The ego of man believes that we are special in that we have the capacity to contemplate such things so such things must be actualities. Imo, this is a delusion of grandeur, the exegesis of which is called the Bible.

Unfortunately for us (and you), there are competing forms and some wish to kill you for not believing in theirs. This is God's will? Preposterous.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why think of God(s)? If such an entity exists then we are integral to it, albeit, an infinitesimally tiny piece. If we are an expression of God through creation then what need have we to contemplate it? What need does God have for our contemplation? The ego of man believes that we are special in that we have the capacity to contemplate such things so such things must be actualities. Imo, this is a delusion of grandeur, the exegesis of which is called the Bible.

Unfortunately for us (and you), there are competing forms and some wish to kill you for not believing in theirs. This is God's will? Preposterous.

Very unfortunate, if you are in those forms. I hope you know what is grace.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very unfortunate, if you are in those forms. I hope you know what is grace.

I understand grace. I am rejecting it as unnecessary to the appreciation of existence and inevitably harmful to the existence of others with different views. It is pure ego to suggest that there must be a specified justification to exist, especially when it is the one which you hold most dear. Faith and science are irreconcilable until faith can agree that science wins out in the realm of reason. If, however, science finds God, well, that's a different story altogether. If we all have grace yet still disagree then what is the point of thinking it is of any use?

When you tout the veracity of a fantastical book then I'm afraid you're in one of those forms. That will be taken as evidence of a predetermined outlook which can only prejudice one as to the facts of existence as we discover them. Others in different faiths will be opposed. There must needs be conflict. This is what faith does best.

Justification for our existence will not be found nor agreed upon.

Get out there and enjoy existence for its own sake!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your fate is a human, no matter how arrogant you are. Your human nature will teach you now and then that you are not the universe. You neutralize a huge pain only as you do not suffer from it, you have to deal with it as you actually suffer from it.

I am the universe, and so I've stopped acting selfishly in a cancerous way. Putting humans relativity as the central most important source of truth in the Universe is the cancer.

Watch us as we consume this earth and start looking up to the stars for our next victim.

Edited by Freddy
Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand grace. I am rejecting it as unnecessary to the appreciation of existence and inevitably harmful to the existence of others with different views. It is pure ego to suggest that there must be a specified justification to exist, especially when it is the one which you hold most dear. Faith and science are irreconcilable until faith can agree that science wins out in the realm of reason. If, however, science finds God, well, that's a different story altogether. If we all have grace yet still disagree then what is the point of thinking it is of any use?

When you tout the veracity of a fantastical book then I'm afraid you're in one of those forms. That will be taken as evidence of a predetermined outlook which can only prejudice one as to the facts of existence as we discover them. Others in different faiths will be opposed. There must needs be conflict. This is what faith does best.

Justification for our existence will not be found nor agreed upon.

Get out there and enjoy existence for its own sake

I know the hardness as you try to say what you do not really know. If I am in such situation, I usually feel very humble.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am the universe, and so I've stopped acting selfishly in a cancerous way. Putting humans relativity as the central most important source of truth in the Universe is the cancer.

Watch us as we consume this earth and start looking up to the stars for our next victim.

I know you want to mean you are cancer and universe at the same time. Remember, I am not one of your "us", which may be only you. I already discuss with your up about you, they already told me your identity.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ask your up, if you can.

The universe dose not care to answer such insignificant questions.

Continue on, man of the robes consuming your God. It is your destiny. He forgives you as you do not know what you do.

Edited by Freddy
Link to post
Share on other sites

The universe dose not care to answer such insignificant questions.

Continue on, man of the robes consuming your God. It is your destiny.

You mean your mouth can not ask it meaningfully.

You are a cancer, no man fear about that.

Edited by Exegesisme
Link to post
Share on other sites

When your branch is somewhere else, all in front of you leaves you emptiness.

relative to yourself, yes.

Relative to the universe, no.

The emptiness doesn't exist, it refills itself as it empties itself. The void creates a vacuum that continually re-fills itself.

This is why good and bad are irrelevant. It just is and moves forward in time. That is all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

relative to yourself, yes.

Relative to the universe, no.

The emptiness doesn't exist, it refills itself as it empties itself. The void creates a vacuum that continually re-fills itself.

This is why good and bad are irrelevant. It just is and moves forward in time. That is all.

I blindly describe something for a blindness.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Words are wasted. To start a discussion to promote a pov then respond with non-responses when questioned is kind of futile, no?

What was the point again?

That religion is the cancer, and it must be abandoned if humans are to grow forward into something more intelligent

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Similar Content

    • By Regina
      The Canadian Government is planning to waste at least $235 million for a project, The Thirty Meter Telescope, which won't even be built on Canadian soil.  The Thirty Meter Telescope most likely will employ few Canadians.  To make matters worse, the telescope will be built in Hawaii, USA on land which is both environmentally and religiously sensitive to the indigenous Hawaiians.  I hope everybody will protest against the waste of tax money and human rights abuses.  Please sign the petition to stop the injustice happening within the USA at the expense of Canadian taxpayers.  I am posting a link to an online petition against the Thirty Meter Telescope and waste of taxpayer money: https://www.change.org/p/justin-trudeau-a-call-to-divest-canada-s-research-funding-for-the-thirty-meter-telescope-on-mauna-kea
      Please tell your friends to sign the petition too.  Thank you for your time.
    • By Canuck100
      A great source of information on the ‘Climate Model’ used by politicians to scam us! Should we be surprised how the wool was pulled over our eyes? 
       
      The scientists who believe in the carbon dioxide theory of global warming do so essentially because of the application of “basic physics” to climate, by a model that is ubiquitous and traditional in climate science. This model is rarely named, but is sometimes referred to as the “forcing-feedback framework or paradigm.” Explicitly called the “forcing-feedback model” (FFM) here, this pen-and-paper model estimates the sensitivity of the global temperature to increasing carbon dioxide.
      The FFM has serious architectural errors. Fixing the architecture, while keeping the physics, shows that future warming due to increasing carbon dioxide will be a fifth to a tenth of current official estimates. Less than 20% of the global warming since 1973 was due to increasing carbon dioxide.
      The large computerized climate models (GCMs) are indirectly tailored to compute the same sensitivity to carbon dioxide as the FFM. Both explain 20th century warming as driven mostly by increasing carbon dioxide.
      Increasing carbon dioxide traps more heat. But that heat mainly just reroutes to space from water vapor instead. This all happens high in the atmosphere, so it has little effect on the Earth’s surface, where we live. Current climate models omit this rerouting. Rerouting cannot occur in the FFM, due to its architecture—rerouting is in its blindspot.
      http://sciencespeak.com/climate-basic.html
      http://joannenova.com.au/2015/09/new-science-1-pushing-the-edge-of-climate-research-back-to-the-new-old-way-of-doing-science/
    • By Exegesisme
      The Reason of Creation
      By Exegesisme
      Why did God created and manages the universe, living beings and human worship and faith?
      These are the job of God. God makes his own living by his job. On the progress of my meditation, I believe God needs to breath in the gravitational wave with greater meaning and order, and breath out the gravitational wave with less great meaning and order. God needs to continue this breath for his living process.
      I make this hypothesis by my own experience of meditation. I communicate with many different images of God, and receive information from them everyday, and I also communicate with all other images, in which include the soul of Galileo (the physicist), the soul of Nikola Tesla (the inventor), the soul of earth (Gaia). I reorganize all these information with greater meaning and higher order. I get a sense that God enjoys my work.
      To my experience, as I write this piece of words, the images of God know them well. If they are interested by my words, they will communicate with me here after about its meaning when I am in state of meditation.
      In me, my genome is the core, which responds all activities of information through my body.
    • By Exegesisme
      4 Fundamental Changes of Science Will Be Very Soon, My Scientific Work​​
      By Exegesisme
      1 Fundamental changes of science will be very soon.
      2 I am discovering the structure of atomic nuclei and a crucial progress was made recently. The structures of atomic nuclei such as Ca, Fe, Ni and so on are as clear as the structure of molecules in front of me, the positions of every proton and neutron are careful arranged in my model of atomic nuclei.
      3 The modern physics has been built fundamentally on mistaking principles, their validities will be recounted on new principles.
      4 Sleep meditation will become the most fundamental mothed of scientific research and other human important practises.
      5 Some results now are already well prepared for journalism to make big news.
    • By Exegesisme
      3 Science of Word, My Study with Sleep Meditation​
      By Exegesisme
      1:45 PM 2015-11-21​
      1 John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
      2 According to my experience of my study with sleep meditation, the Word knows everything meaningfully to her. She pays attention to me to guide my work. I use the words she and her to represent the character of the Word. The word her represents her identity, the word she represents her intention-attention system at each moment.
      3 I found usual human words and grammars are not enough as I tried to express more meaningfully after I studied much human knowledge. I invented a new style of poetry as my grammar of expression, and many words with sounds but without meaning.
      4 I used these meaningless words in my new style poems, and tried to taste, feel and sense what sort of delicate meaning would appear. Through this account I opened the door of the testament of meaning.
      5 I have been noticing a new language is emerging in my account of poetry with sources from present English and present Chinese. The language is deconstructing the old meaning world and is constituting a new meaning world.
      6 The new meaning world is nearer to the pure meaning world of the Word, so everything is more accountable, more responsible and more liberty in the new meaning world than in the old meaning world.
      7 Accountability is key, not only to person of human, but also to per-being of everything.
      8 My new language is building on the science of the Word, and will provide ideas, methods and materials to the formal sciences and other theoretical sciences.
      9 My experience is meta-empirical, which means essentially empirical, and is the experience to understand other empirical experiences.
      10 This account is not in new language, but some meanings are from new language.
  • Tell a friend

    Love Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
×
×
  • Create New...