Jump to content
Political Discussion Forums

2 Science of Mass, My Scientific Work​​


Recommended Posts

2 Science of Mass, My Scientific Work​​

By Exegesisme

1, Mass essentially is a general magnitude of potential being of energy, and energy is a general magnitude of dynamic being of mass. Neutrino oscillation properly shows the relation between mass and energy, and Germany maybe make a surprising scientific discovery in this area. ​

2, Science of mass is different from physics. In physics, mass is a property of physical matter, in science of mass, mass is core of physical world and non-physical world.

3, In science of mass, gravitational mass is different from inertia mass. Gravitational mass is seen as out mass, all out masses are related to each other by gravity. For example, each particle is related to all other particles by gravity, so the jump up or down of an electron in an atom actually causes to absorb or radiate out a neutrino, except a photon, to represent an important change of position in the gravitational relation. Inertia mass is seen as inner mass, all inner masses as a whole show inertia in a motion caused by an integrated force, and as each other form sense, feelings, emotions in spirit, mind, soul.

4, The magnitudes of mass in spirit is so subtle, a being can not directly feel, in mind is just large enough to sense for reason, and in soul is so large, the being of it is named as emotion. In other words, spirit is the faculty for very small magnitude of mass at present stage still without obvious meaning, mind is the faculty for the magnitude of mass with reasonable meaning, soul is the faculty for the magnitude of mass with emotion to form an immediate attitude.

5, In different developed level of individual, or society, the magnitude of mass for spirit, mind, and soul are different. Although all human beings, and all societies should be respected, however, they are truly at different levels in the order of holy hierarchy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Similar Content

    • By Regina
      The Canadian Government is planning to waste at least $235 million for a project, The Thirty Meter Telescope, which won't even be built on Canadian soil.  The Thirty Meter Telescope most likely will employ few Canadians.  To make matters worse, the telescope will be built in Hawaii, USA on land which is both environmentally and religiously sensitive to the indigenous Hawaiians.  I hope everybody will protest against the waste of tax money and human rights abuses.  Please sign the petition to stop the injustice happening within the USA at the expense of Canadian taxpayers.  I am posting a link to an online petition against the Thirty Meter Telescope and waste of taxpayer money: https://www.change.org/p/justin-trudeau-a-call-to-divest-canada-s-research-funding-for-the-thirty-meter-telescope-on-mauna-kea
      Please tell your friends to sign the petition too.  Thank you for your time.
    • By Canuck100
      A great source of information on the ‘Climate Model’ used by politicians to scam us! Should we be surprised how the wool was pulled over our eyes? 
       
      The scientists who believe in the carbon dioxide theory of global warming do so essentially because of the application of “basic physics” to climate, by a model that is ubiquitous and traditional in climate science. This model is rarely named, but is sometimes referred to as the “forcing-feedback framework or paradigm.” Explicitly called the “forcing-feedback model” (FFM) here, this pen-and-paper model estimates the sensitivity of the global temperature to increasing carbon dioxide.
      The FFM has serious architectural errors. Fixing the architecture, while keeping the physics, shows that future warming due to increasing carbon dioxide will be a fifth to a tenth of current official estimates. Less than 20% of the global warming since 1973 was due to increasing carbon dioxide.
      The large computerized climate models (GCMs) are indirectly tailored to compute the same sensitivity to carbon dioxide as the FFM. Both explain 20th century warming as driven mostly by increasing carbon dioxide.
      Increasing carbon dioxide traps more heat. But that heat mainly just reroutes to space from water vapor instead. This all happens high in the atmosphere, so it has little effect on the Earth’s surface, where we live. Current climate models omit this rerouting. Rerouting cannot occur in the FFM, due to its architecture—rerouting is in its blindspot.
      http://sciencespeak.com/climate-basic.html
      http://joannenova.com.au/2015/09/new-science-1-pushing-the-edge-of-climate-research-back-to-the-new-old-way-of-doing-science/
    • By Exegesisme
      4 Fundamental Changes of Science Will Be Very Soon, My Scientific Work​​
      By Exegesisme
      1 Fundamental changes of science will be very soon.
      2 I am discovering the structure of atomic nuclei and a crucial progress was made recently. The structures of atomic nuclei such as Ca, Fe, Ni and so on are as clear as the structure of molecules in front of me, the positions of every proton and neutron are careful arranged in my model of atomic nuclei.
      3 The modern physics has been built fundamentally on mistaking principles, their validities will be recounted on new principles.
      4 Sleep meditation will become the most fundamental mothed of scientific research and other human important practises.
      5 Some results now are already well prepared for journalism to make big news.
    • By Exegesisme
      3 Science of Word, My Study with Sleep Meditation​
      By Exegesisme
      1:45 PM 2015-11-21​
      1 John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
      2 According to my experience of my study with sleep meditation, the Word knows everything meaningfully to her. She pays attention to me to guide my work. I use the words she and her to represent the character of the Word. The word her represents her identity, the word she represents her intention-attention system at each moment.
      3 I found usual human words and grammars are not enough as I tried to express more meaningfully after I studied much human knowledge. I invented a new style of poetry as my grammar of expression, and many words with sounds but without meaning.
      4 I used these meaningless words in my new style poems, and tried to taste, feel and sense what sort of delicate meaning would appear. Through this account I opened the door of the testament of meaning.
      5 I have been noticing a new language is emerging in my account of poetry with sources from present English and present Chinese. The language is deconstructing the old meaning world and is constituting a new meaning world.
      6 The new meaning world is nearer to the pure meaning world of the Word, so everything is more accountable, more responsible and more liberty in the new meaning world than in the old meaning world.
      7 Accountability is key, not only to person of human, but also to per-being of everything.
      8 My new language is building on the science of the Word, and will provide ideas, methods and materials to the formal sciences and other theoretical sciences.
      9 My experience is meta-empirical, which means essentially empirical, and is the experience to understand other empirical experiences.
      10 This account is not in new language, but some meanings are from new language.
    • By Exegesisme
      3 Higher Science of History, My Scientific Work​​​
      By Exegesisme
      1 My higher science of history is different from science of history. Science of history pays attention to facts of bodies. My higher science of history not only pays attention to facts of bodies, but pays more attention to facts of what influences bodies.
      2 Therefore, I pay more attention to spirit, mind, soul, emotion and others which influence body from upon body. From this direction, I get the conclusion, some histories are meaningful, and some histories are meaningless. As two examples, the history of Christianity is meaningful, the history of China until now is meaningless. I can delete China from history, until now, without so much consequence on the whole human history. If there is any consequence, it is negative. If there is any positive consequence, the positive consequence can be easily replaced.
      3 However, this is higher science of history, so the story usually does not tell in this way, for the higher science of history should pay attention to the emotion of more than one billion Chinese people. How I tell the story has relation to their benefits of living.
      4 Although I have noticed the emotion of Chinese people, I still decide to tell the truth, their history is history of rogues, hoodlums, and so on. You see the Chinese communist party, they are these sorts of thing. Who are more violent, who are more disguised, who take the power until they lose in farther more violence and disguise.
      5 The history of Christianity is different. On each important moment, the spiritual progress takes leadership, violence is in much small scale, less truthful disguise is replaced by more truthful disguise, new knowledge builds the history. Until everything new becomes old again. And god reveals new spiritual progress and new knowledge again.
  • Tell a friend

    Love Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
×
×
  • Create New...