By Hudson Jones
With Right Wing Nationalism rhetoric on the rise in the West, we're seeing more and more violent behaviour. From the Norway right wing extremist who killed 77 people and injured dozens of others, to the increasing attacks on immigrants, what's the right way to approach this?
Jo Cox, a Labour MP was stabbed and shot by a man yelling "Put Britain first".
4 Definition of Exegesisme, My Spiritual Work
1xπ exegesisme, under reference from god, in grace of god and holy time, and with words in the framework of omega theology of bible, I study, research and create my own me, for approaching my identity of future Christian, as preparation of the second coming of the Christ with his new name.
2xπ revelation3:12 him who overcomes I will make a pillar in the temple of my god, never again will he leave it. I will write on him the name of my god and the name of the city of my god, the new jerusalem, which is coming down out of heaven from my god, and I will also write on him my new name.
By Not Yet
Canada has always been a loyal ally to the U.S. But is there a limit to this loyalty as Chretien once demonstrated? Will too much loyalty to America kill and terrorize more Canadians for no justiafiable reasons? At first I was of the attitude "Kill all those damn terrorists" until I read this article and realize that if some foreign troops invaded and occupied Canada because our leader refused to turn over Canada's oil fields for pennies on the dollar, we'd also be pissed off. And if we came home from work one day and found our home smoldering in flames and our spouse and kids charred black like coal from some stray missile, we would also be outraged and called "patriots" to seek revenge on the barbaric bastards responsible for the war crime. So today my opinion is a little more objective. Read this and see if your truly disagree or if you are just trying to be politically correct or a false patriot http://www.globalresearch.ca/prime-minister-stephen-harper-and-canadian-war-crimes-in-afghanistan/24473
This is why IMO Harper has helped to increase terrorism in the world today. Real terrorism must be stopped, but drones impose terrorism from 30,000 feet and Harper implicitly condones this by unconditionally supporting American policies in Afghanistan and Iraq. http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2014/nov/24/-sp-us-drone-strikes-kill-1147
The UN and 57 countries have agreed that drones = terrorism and the war in Afghanistan is illegal. So should Canada really be fighting America's illegal war? Before you answer just think about how fairly America has treated Canada on past lumber and trade deals. Do they really deserve such unconditional loyalty or do we have the right to say "No Thank You" once in a while?
Political Philosophy for Human Future 1 Definition
Definition: originally in physics, the rate of doing work.
Definition: the rate of doing work on human source, including physical source, emotional source, soulful source, mindful source, and spiritual source. And human, refers from one human to all humans.
Definition: the appearance of something in the process from its beginning to its end.
Definition: the being of human power for the future of itself.
Definition: the study of the being of human power for the future of itself.(1)
(1) For politics should be full of wisdoms, the study of politics should be political philosophy.
Tell a friend