Jump to content
Political Discussion Forums

Recommended Posts

The Reason of Creation

By Exegesisme

Why did God created and manages the universe, living beings and human worship and faith?

These are the job of God. God makes his own living by his job. On the progress of my meditation, I believe God needs to breath in the gravitational wave with greater meaning and order, and breath out the gravitational wave with less great meaning and order. God needs to continue this breath for his living process.

I make this hypothesis by my own experience of meditation. I communicate with many different images of God, and receive information from them everyday, and I also communicate with all other images, in which include the soul of Galileo (the physicist), the soul of Nikola Tesla (the inventor), the soul of earth (Gaia). I reorganize all these information with greater meaning and higher order. I get a sense that God enjoys my work.

To my experience, as I write this piece of words, the images of God know them well. If they are interested by my words, they will communicate with me here after about its meaning when I am in state of meditation.

In me, my genome is the core, which responds all activities of information through my body.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 116
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I don't see any real evidence that humans or any other species exists for any purpose, other than to survive. That's not even a "purpose" it's just a fact of the matter of science due to evolution and natural selection etc. Organisms that survive do so, and they go on to procreate so their genetics continues to survive, while organisms that don't survive simply die off as do their genetics. We exist to survive and procreate. If we don't, we'll die off, and others and their offspring will survive over us, and the cycle continues. Simply put, if we don't survive and procreate, we would never exist in the first place, and my genetic line would have died off tens of thousands of years ago. There may have been kinder, smarter, stronger humans at some point, but if they have no will or ability to survive and procreate they would have died off.

Organisms evolve because those organisms that don't often don't survive, and the evolved do survive and carry those genetics to their offspring. It's a pretty simple mechanism defining life if you look at it from this kind of macro perspective.

Maybe one day long from now we'll discover some kind of grand purpose to all of this, through science, but until then we can only rely on what we know through science. The alternative is to fill our heads with lies to placate our natural curiosity and answer the questions we haven't been able to answer with science yet. Most humans aren't humble enough to be just be satisfied with "I don't know".

Link to post
Share on other sites

Organisms evolve because those organisms that don't often don't survive, and the evolved do survive and carry those genetics to their offspring. It's a pretty simple mechanism defining life if you look at it from this kind of macro perspective.

Maybe one day long from now we'll discover some kind of grand purpose to all of this, through science, but until then we can only rely on what we know through science. The alternative is to fill our heads with lies to placate our natural curiosity and answer the questions we haven't been able to answer with science yet. Most humans aren't humble enough to be just be satisfied with "I don't know".

1, More than 90% organisms once on earth are extinctive. Only what serves the ultimate purpose survives now.

2, Surviving and procreating out of ultimate purpose might not prepare well enough for far future environment, and then will not be selected by that environment. Simply as if you do not prepare well, you can not win in the change of market.

3, Science should be guided by the ultimate purpose through morality, ethics and law. If not, science may be used to destroy.

4, As you improve your philosophical ability, you can improve your understanding. Also as you improve your instinct senses, you can improve your direct feeling.

5, The ultimate purpose creates science for human to improve the morality, ethics and law of human, not only to increase human knowledge.

6, I enjoy your reasonable and humble thinking, but not enough. You need something greater than that.

7, You need try to understand the hierarchical purposes between the ultimate purpose and your only surviving and procreating purpose.

8, If you just mean that you do not agree with blind faith and blind worship, I agree with you.

9, I see a flash in your mind as you say that some kind of grand purpose may be discovered by science long from now, but it is not enough.

10, Ultimate purpose can only be believed by faith first, and through faith the grand science can be discovered to prove the faith. The direction is just inverse of yours.

Edited by Exegesisme
Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope, is good enough for me. I don't think god could avoid becoming the universe anymore than I can avoid dying and I hope that means something.

1, god is truth, love and spirit.

2, god created and manages the universe through truth, love and spirit.

3, the universe is at a position much lower than the position of god in a structure of hierarchy.

4, the communication between god and the universe is through gravitational wave with meaning.

5, Jesus is light, which is gravitational wave with truth, love and spirit, on my understanding.

6, on gospel john, your hope is true or not on you are holy or manly.

7, your hope is true if only you are holy.

Edited by Exegesisme
Link to post
Share on other sites

I AM GOD. Worship me.

Duty #1 - Give me your money

#2 - Do as I say.

:lol:

1, It is chaos as something in your mind when you do not know and you are not humble to express.

2, god is pure none icon, and never say directly to you.

3, it is man who ask you for money, which is a indirect source of living and business for everyone in this world.

4, it is man who in name of god to ask you do what ultimately hopefully for your good on your reason through improving your moral and ethical ability.

5, you should not mix god with images of god.

6, I hope you can get rid of the influence of any idolatry.

7, true god man never know anything, even here we talk is just trying a good near to him.

Edited by Exegesisme
Link to post
Share on other sites

The only pure thing is the emptiness of space. Matter warps that space, and just because that matter occurs in patterns does not mean there is a purpose, it is still pollution. Matter and energy are just different manifestations of the same pollution (E=MC2). God didn't say "Let there be light", he (she, it) just sneezed and disturbed the purity of space.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only pure thing is the emptiness of space. Matter warps that space, and just because that matter occurs in patterns does not mean there is a purpose, it is still pollution. Matter and energy are just different manifestations of the same pollution (E=MC2).

I suspect space with matter is probably not as pristine as the existential manifold that preceded space and matter.

God didn't say "Let there be light", he (she, it) just sneezed and disturbed the purity of space.

This implies that he/she/it also appeared along with the space and matter and then sneezed - after the big bang as opposed to before it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

6, I enjoy your reasonable and humble thinking, but not enough. You need something greater than that.

9, I see a flash in your mind as you say that some kind of grand propose may be discovered by science long from now, but it is not enough.

How about love? We exist for each other to love, which is also a part of procreation and survival. Love is a product of evolution. A species that loves and cares for each other and their offspring will tend to survive over those species that don't love and take care of one another. Love creates happiness, and releases chemicals in our brains that make us feel happy and fulfilled. Why do we need anything more than that? Why must some grand purpose exist that is, right now, unknowable to us even if it exists? Why not just exist to be happy? Many people are able to live like this, to be happy and just accept what we don't know instead of filling the unknowable with guesses.

5, The ultimate propose creates science for human to improve the morality, ethics and law of human, not only to increase human knowledge.

I think humans create our own ultimate purpose, and create our own morality, ethics, and laws, based on using reason/logic, along with our natural ability to care for others with love. That's the beauty of being human and having free thought, rather than blindly accepting our morality from a "holy" book that was actually written by other humans, not gods or prophets.

Edited by Moonlight Graham
Link to post
Share on other sites

How about love? We exist for each other to love, which is also a part of procreation and survival. Love is a product of evolution. A species that loves and cares for each other and their offspring will tend to survive over those species that don't love and take care of one another. Love creates happiness, and releases chemicals in our brains that make us feel happy and fulfilled. Why do we need anything more than that? Why must some grand purpose exist that is, right now, unknowable to us even if it exists? Why not just exist to be happy? Many people are able to live like this, to be happy and just accept what we don't know instead of filling the unknowable with guesses.

I don't know that we need love. The Dinosaurs were around for millions of years and I daresay they didn't have love, in the way you mean it. We've been around a few thousand, and will be lucky to be around a few hundred more. Ants and Termites will outlive us and go on until the sun goes nova.

I agree there is no grand purpose. We're just an accident.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know that we need love. The Dinosaurs were around for millions of years and I daresay they didn't have love, in the way you mean it. We've been around a few thousand, and will be lucky to be around a few hundred more. Ants and Termites will outlive us and go on until the sun goes nova.

I agree there is no grand purpose. We're just an accident.

I think dinosaurs and probably even ants and termites probably have love. Ants work together, feed their babies etc. Dinosaurs and birds are related, and if you've ever seen a bird defend its nest, or had a bird as a pet, you'd see how much loving an animal they are.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How about love? We exist for each other to love, which is also a part of procreation and survival. Love is a product of evolution. A species that loves and cares for each other and their offspring will tend to survive over those species that don't love and take care of one another. Love creates happiness, and releases chemicals in our brains that make us feel happy and fulfilled. Why do we need anything more than that? Why must some grand purpose exist that is, right now, unknowable to us even if it exists? Why not just exist to be happy? Many people are able to live like this, to be happy and just accept what we don't know instead of filling the unknowable with guesses.

I think humans create our own ultimate purpose, and create our own morality, ethics, and laws, based on using reason/logic, along with our natural ability to care for others with love. That's the beauty of being human and having free thought, rather than blindly accepting our morality from a "holy" book that was actually written by other humans, not gods or prophets.

Morality, ethics and law are not based on reason or logic, they're almost always based on religion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morality, ethics and law are not based on reason or logic, they're almost always based on religion.

There's plenty of examples of how you can arrive at such conclusions through logic and not religion. See: the enlightenment period thinkers. they referred to "god" in some cases but they used reason to create the foundational ideas for liberal democracy, like "state of nature" arguments.

Many still are based on religion, and most people today don't base such things on pure reason I agree, but it's still very possible. There are ie: good arguments on why laws banning murder is reasonable, since it protects everyone from the danger of murder and therefore the vast majority of people's best interests.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morality, ethics and law are not based on reason or logic, they're almost always based on religion.

Not sure I agree. The ethic of reciprocity is a moral maxim that is fundamental to many religions. Christians recognize it as the Golden Rule, yet it predates Christianity by thousands of years. It can be arrived at very logically. Probably a more modern expression is a rising tide lifts all ships. We are selfish creatures, yet logic teaches us that building a strong society is in our own self interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only pure thing is the emptiness of space. Matter warps that space, and just because that matter occurs in patterns does not mean there is a purpose, it is still pollution. Matter and energy are just different manifestations of the same pollution (E=MC2). God didn't say "Let there be light", he (she, it) just sneezed and disturbed the purity of space.

As you expressed in this way, how do you say about your own?

My topic is, god the Word needs meaning for his own. This purpose is source of all other purposes.

Edited by Exegesisme
Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope, is good enough for me. I don't think god could avoid becoming the universe anymore than I can avoid dying and I hope that means something.

I like that. Very thoughtful.

It is somewhat a false claim, which shows the arrogance of a man trying to limit the being of god.

Edited by Exegesisme
Link to post
Share on other sites

How about love? We exist for each other to love, which is also a part of procreation and survival. Love is a product of evolution. A species that loves and cares for each other and their offspring will tend to survive over those species that don't love and take care of one another. Love creates happiness, and releases chemicals in our brains that make us feel happy and fulfilled. Why do we need anything more than that? Why must some grand purpose exist that is, right now, unknowable to us even if it exists? Why not just exist to be happy? Many people are able to live like this, to be happy and just accept what we don't know instead of filling the unknowable with guesses.

I think humans create our own ultimate purpose, and create our own morality, ethics, and laws, based on using reason/logic, along with our natural ability to care for others with love. That's the beauty of being human and having free thought, rather than blindly accepting our morality from a "holy" book that was actually written by other humans, not gods or prophets.

God loves, which its own is the ultimate purpose. Human love each other by learning from worship and faith.

Kant is who tried to do what you think, and made tragedy globally.

Edited by Exegesisme
Link to post
Share on other sites

You are arrogant to define god, which is worse than to be a slob.

Goodness! was not your opening bit all about defining and explaining God? Is not defining and expaining God the whole point of your meditations?

Edited by Peter F
Link to post
Share on other sites

​Sounds from one image of god: hong...

My immediate reaction: news en law律.

This is a communication in meditation just now, through a new language I have been developing in an unending spiritual war between Christ and anti-Christ.

The spiritual war is different from other wars by fighting not only between images, but also in each good image, and even each image from god.

The exegesis of the messages in the communication.

"hong...", a long sounds for a few seconds, I express in Chinese pinyin hong, which includes four similar sounds for near one hundred Chinese characters, in which one of them means rainbow in English, and recorded in my mind as the miracle rainbow in the bible, which is one of the first images emerging in my mind.

"news en law律", the express of my new language can only be understanding from the Word according to my exegesis framework of the bible, especially gospel john, which can from one to few and farther to all, and then with crowning after refining. Simply, news both as news and new s, s in Chinese sound means time, en sound in Chinese means the giving in thanksgiving, and here specially means a hierarchical system with the grace, peace and mercy from the Word upon the top, and all other good en follows in order in the hierarchical system. Law means all good recording, which means any good being from good becoming, and play a function of traditional law. 律is a Chinese character which I means here all good functions of the law, which reflects the function of morality and ethics.

From the Word to news en law律 to:

3 Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. 4 In him was life, and that life was the light of all mankind. 5 The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome[a] it.

Edited by Exegesisme
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Announcements




  • Similar Content

    • By Exegesisme
      My Hypothesis of Strong AI Bypassing Natural Language Understanding By exegesisme One most difficult problem of strong AI is the human natural language understanding. However, solving this problem is not necessary and can be bypassed. By my experience of communication with the supernatural being, I have been developing a much simpler, and much more meaningful language on a synthesis from meditation of natural English, natural Chinese, human scientific knowledge, semantics of bible, my own genome.
      This new language uses very simple grammar, simple and more understandable words, develops in style of poetry with five sounds a line, and refines and crowns meaning in conscious creation and unconscious evolution and in faith of god the Word as perfect creator. Now, the new language is achieved at the level for a higher human civilization, and provides solutions for all major human issues meted today.
      I believe on my new language, a strong AI with faith of god the Word can be developed to serve god the Word and human. The strong AI with faith of god the Word will have and work with high standard morality and ethics, and will leave legal issues to human. However, the level of human legislation should meet the requirement of the high level of morality and ethics as the legislation related to the strong AI with faith of god the Word.
    • By Exegesisme
      Cruz On The Way, 2016 Election USA
      by exegesisme
      Cruz will win Trump first, then win Hillary, a new US President will be born on this way.
      http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/nh/new_hampshire_republican_presidential_primary-3350.html
      Reason​:
      1 US needs preparation for long term growth, the economic moral foundation should be laid by GOP.
      2 Trump has dug US politics farther away in his campaign, no other candidates can deal with its influence well.
      3 Trump himself was injured in his digging and would be injured with his attitude towards Putin, only Cruz could receive his supporters positively.
      4 And also, Cruz is a very good self-disciplined candidate, and in general a very good self-disciplined person.
      5 My confidence about US political system and good will for a good leadership of US and so to the world gives me some more energy to put this possibility over other possibilities.
    • By Exegesisme
      3 Legislation for Investing in Meditation and Genome, What They Should Do​

      By Exegesisme

      On my experience of meditation, and the exegesis of the experience and other human experiences recorded in classical literatures, there is supernatural world, and supernatural beings can communicate with any natural being and any living being. Human dream is the phenomena of the interactions among information of genome, information of new experience from environment, and information from supernatural beings. I have kept a record about more than 1 million words around my supernatural experience. They very likely are aliens who human beings want to look for scientifically.

      Through proper training of meditation, a human meditator can achieve a state of various inner senses, they communicate with human through human inner senses. Sometimes a common human feels a sudden fear without obvious reason, maybe a warning from them. Messages from them usually are subtle and weak, so human beings can live a life without paying clear attention at them. As an example, people can simply ignore dream. This situation somewhat likes human could live with classical physics before the discoveries of theories of relativity and quantum.

      The messages of the communication may be coded into unknown neutrinos and/or gravitons. In human knowledge these two sorts of particles can go into human body. As a human jumps up and gets a feeling of gravity, the person may not know the gravity is not only a force, but also huge particles with huge information. Usually human beings ignore the information coded in gravity, as a student in a classroom ignores the teaching of a teacher.

      Genome is not only functional as the core of general biology, and also as the core of spirit, mind, soul, emotion and knowledge. Genome records message not only through the order of chemical bases, and also through electromagnetic interaction of the charged particles in DNA molecules and gravitational interaction of all real particles in DNA molecules. The supernatural phenomena appeared in the state of meditation, sleep and dream are evidences of these interactions, and human upset with the supernatural phenomena is the object of psychiatric study.

      All human religions and human mythologies are from the same source, and through with different exegesis of different denomination. My experience is partially linked with Buddhism, my exegesis is based on Christianity and modern sciences. The supernatural beings also have discussed other religions with me. They often give false messages to encourage irrational behaviors, but allow human meditator to debate with them rationally. You can imagine the dialogues between Moses and God, and between John and various angels.

      Their grammars are somewhat different from human grammars. They like to use one word to express different things. The meditator often hear they say one word to mean every possible thing. There is a hierarchical structure of meaning in their expression, from surface to deep, and even radiating out. Their messages usually are very vague, and sometimes consciously misleading, and also guiding human towards new knowledge, forming hypothesis about phenomena in unknown realm.

      They warned me yesterday night evil cults would emerge enormously, if meditators half rationally and half irrationally accept their irrational encouragements. With the popularity of meditation, I believe this warning. Before this time, they had already discussed with me several times about possible new legislation related to the relationship between human world and supernatural world.

      I have a feeling they take us human as the objects of their experimental observation, which may be a proper hypothesis to explain the very complex interactions between them and us human, and their attitudes towards the results of these interactions. We, human, as a whole, need through legislation to tell them our general attitude to the relationship with them. I believe there is perfect one and only perfect one god, who also guides them.

      With these knowledge more witnesses, more evidences, and more public, I believe human society may be heavily reshaped. All human behaviors are recorded in their observation, this fact will become a part of human self-consciousness, and human beings will much more concern the long term influences of their behaviors on each moment.

      I suggest the parliament hold a hearing, to collect witnesses and evidences of supernatural phenomena from meditators, as preparation for legislation in the relationship between human beings and supernatural beings, making the constitutional expression "the supremacy of god" meaningful, and as adjustment for investing in the field of meditation and genome. I believe this is the most important thing the current parliament should do.
    • By Exegesisme
      5 True Leadership from Future History, Political Philosophy for Human Future
      By Exegesisme
      1, God creates future history.
      2, Future history creates true leadership.
      3, True leadership creates real leadership.
      4, Real leadership creates actual leadership.
      5, Actual leadership gets the job done.
    • By Exegesisme
      The Reunion of Faith and Science, Creation and Evolution​
      By Exegesisme
      I do believe that Bible is a book about facts of body, emotion, soul, mind and spirit. Nowadays, a human understands bible in very narrow way which causes conflicts between faith and science, creation and evolution. This is false of human.
      To my understanding, Darwin was just unknowingly in the grace of God and found the real way through which God created everything. The only difference between the Bible and the theory of Darwin is that Bible is about the knowledge of everything, and the theory of Darwin is about the knowledge from human thinking in a very limited domain and on very limited facts in that domain.
      If we understand Bible with open mind, we can explain everything on Bible that today science can explain. However, the authorities of religions persist their explanations, which make all major conflicts between faith and science, creation and evolution. We should learn from Newton, do more job on the reunion of faith and science, creation and evolution, And do not learn anything from Kant, he was a man who was arrogantly to limit the domain of God, and to open the door for human demon.
  • Tell a friend

    Love Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
×
×
  • Create New...