Jump to content
Political Discussion Forums
hot enough

Why all the worldwide turmoil? (9/11 thread)

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, hot enough said:

It's particularly childish, delusional to offer your arrant nonsense, above, considering how many false flag events you have never heard of. That is how "need to know basis" works. It's easy to see it's a cover up by how many scientists are silent. Asked to defend the US government conspiracy theory no one from any US university physics department would do so.

Even you lie about the towers design and then flee, time after time. 

Even you ignore absolute impossibilities in the US conspiracy theory and then you flee. 

What lie did I tell about the design?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Omni said:

What lie did I tell about the design?

You lie constantly about every little thing, just to attempt diversion. That is how dishonest US government conspiracy theorists are. You know exactly the lie you told about the twin towers design and now you play dumb. 

You can never, have never provided any evidence that would support the wacky US government conspiracy theory. No one has, ever.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, hot enough said:

You lie constantly about every little thing, just to attempt diversion. That is how dishonest US government conspiracy theorists are. You know exactly the lie you told about the twin towers design and now you play dumb. 

You can never, have never provided any evidence that would support the wacky US government conspiracy theory. No one has, ever.

So yet another deflection. It's getting rather redundant.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, hot enough said:

The Gulf of Tonkin lie was covered for decades.

Gulf of Tonkin (there were two incidents reported) wasn't the casus belli for the War in Indochina Pt II. It had already been going on since 1959.

GoT allowed the US to respond to NVA aggression by bombing the North. A double edge sword as it meant coming in direct conflict with Soviet troops who helped man North Viet-Nam's SAM sites and fly MiGs.

The event that opened the door to US and other SEATO nations to "come on down" was the NVA's attack on Bien Hoa Airbase in 1964. The US had transferred a wing of B-57 bombers there to act as a deterrent...and as bait...to NVA/PLF forces in the region. The Communists attacked blowing-up numerous B-57s  and killing/wounding US/ARVN troops in the process...taking the bait.

Enter the USMC and friends (Australians, Thais, South Koreans, etc)....to protect the air bases and conduct Search and Destroy operations...before S&D got its TV-News connotations. 

It just kept growing from there.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/10/2017 at 0:55 PM, Wilber said:

So, we have to provide reasons based on knowledge and regulations that you choose to ignore and you just get to pull numbers out of your ass. Got it.

You never replied to this, Wilber, and Omni has been avoiding it diligently. Your knowledge of flight regulations has nothing to do with the twin towers design. 

Why can't you provide a source that supports your contention that WTCs 1 & 2 were designed for a plane hitting at 250 knots? It's because you guys have never known anything about 911. You just repeat propaganda that you heard on "Fox" news.

You two just pulled a number out of your asses.

All the anti-truth science deniers just pull the US government/propaganda, eg, "Let's Roll", out of their asses. This explains why there is no evidence/proof ever offered on the "support the US government conspiracy theory thread or here or anywhere. 

If you were honest enough to look at the evidence, clearly you are not, you would see that the US government conspiracy theory is crazily nonsensical.

Edited by hot enough

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, hot enough said:

You two just pulled a number out of your asses.

No, we pulled it out of numerous FAA and TC publications that describe air regulations. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Omni said:

No, we pulled it out of numerous FAA and TC publications that describe air regulations. 

Out of your asses, like I said. Your asses are your "sources". That's always been the case.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...