Jump to content
Political Discussion Forums
Ewall87

Do you support Western Oil & Gas?

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Zeitgeist said:

You have a very different perception from most Canadians who see Canada as one of the last refuges of true liberal democracy. 

I am a rugged individualist and critical thinker, so obviously the argumentum ad populum of deluded and priggish Canadian Federalist Liberals does not move me

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

I am a rugged individualist and critical thinker, so obviously the argumentum ad populum of deluded and priggish Canadian Federalist Liberals does not move me

I wonder which is the more monarchist voice.  The irony...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Zeitgeist said:

I wonder which is the more monarchist voice.  The irony...

Classical liberal limited government conservatism consent of the governed

My relationship with the monarch is by contractual agreement only, mercenary actually, as all royal armies are.

Contract of unlimited liability fulfilled in every respect.

Why do you think the monarch is against rugged individualism?  HM defends that right too, so far as I am aware, no?

Edited by Dougie93

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Yzermandius19 said:

Dougie's obviously. The People's Republic of Zeitgeist is not pro-monarchy.

Perhaps Zeitgeist is invoking an absolute monarchy?  

Wherein one be bound to loyalty to a government and its polices by order of the monarch?

Quite sure that was overthrown in the Glorious Revolution by the Dutch Regent William of Orange in 1688.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

Perhaps Zeitgeist is invoking an absolute monarchy?  

Wherein one be bound to loyalty to a government and its polices by order of the monarch?

Quite sure that was overthrown in the Glorious Revolution by the Dutch Regent William of Orange in 1688.

Mr. We The People invoking an absolute monarchy? That seems likely.....
lulz

Edited by Yzermandius19

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Yzermandius19 said:

Mr. We The People invoking an absolute monarchy? That seems likely.....
lulz

He does seem to want it both ways,

On the one hand he invokes the republican position that the Queen is not the Queen, Canada is not a monarchy.

Then he turns around and attacks me for being loyal to the Declaration of Independence.

If the Queen is not Queen, there is no there there,  yet he insists that it is treason not to swear fealty to a nothing. 

He demands loyalty to an empty void,

God Save The Nothing.    This is all the Eskimo Communists got in the end.   Sad.

 

Edited by Dougie93

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

He does seem to want it both ways,

On the one hand he invokes the republican position that the Queen is not the Queen, Canada is not a monarchy.

Then he turns around and attacks me for being loyal to the Declaration of Independence.

If the Queen is not Queen, there is no there there,  yet he insists that it is treason not to swear fealty to a nothing. 

He demands loyalty to a empty void,

Seems kind of crazy.

He thinks Canada is The People and Confederation. He thinks the Declaration of Independence is antithetical to the Canadian People and the Anti-American Confederation they currently support. He's an Anti-American Republican who sees the Queen as a mere symbol and The People's Confederation as the real Canada, hence the claims of you being a traitor.

Edited by Yzermandius19

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Dougie93 said:

Iron Curtain against American freedom.   

We've been here before.

 

A traitor to the Iron Curtain against American Freedom?

Mea culpa, mea f*ckin culpa. A badge of honor is what that is.

Edited by Yzermandius19

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A traitor to The People's Republic of Zeitgeist is a clearly a compliment, Zeitgeist is just oblivious to that and thinks it's a pejorative, but an Anti-American Republican would see it that way wouldn't he?

Edited by Yzermandius19

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Yzermandius19 said:

A traitor to The People's Republic of Zeitgeist is a clearly a compliment, Zeitgeist is just oblivious to that and thinks it's a pejorative, but an Anti-American Republican would see it that way wouldn't he?

The Republic of Zeitgeist is just the Democrat Party.

The Democrat Party is running its Liberal Canadian farm team like the Leafs run the Marlies.

The CBC is Canadian CNN, CNN is the American CBC.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

The Republic of Zeitgeist is just the Democrat Party.

The Democrat Party is running its Liberal Canadian farm team like the Leafs run the Marlies.

The CBC is Canadian CNN, CNN is the American CBC.

The hilarious thing is that Zeitgeist does not realize this, because if he did then the Anti-American streak in him would cause him to recoil from the Republic of Zeitgeist. He thinks his Republic is Anti-American while he gets all his talking points from Americans. Funny stuff.

Edited by Yzermandius19

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Yzermandius19 said:

The hilarious thing is that Zeitgeist does not realize this, because if he did then the Anti-American streak in him would cause him to recoil from the Republic of Zeitgeist. He thinks his Republic is anti-American while he gets all his talking points from American Democrats.

Looks like every thread here derails to the point of being unrecognizable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, cougar said:

Looks like every thread here derails to the point of being unrecognizable.

The workings of the government effect support levels for western oil and gas, hence the side tangent. If it weren't for the shotgun marriage for Confederation, Western Oil and Gas would have more buyers, especially within what is currently Canada. It is Confederation which emphasizes the differing interests of the provinces and exacerbates the issue. There would be more East-West trade within Canada without Confederation, it is confederation which puts a damper on it.

Edited by Yzermandius19

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Yzermandius19 said:

Funny stuff.

This is the Liberals. 

The are Americanized republicans.

What is left of Canada once it is not British anymore?

Just the self hating Americans you see now, Democrat Partyland.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Yzermandius19 said:

The workings of the government effect support levels for western oil and gas, hence the side tangent.

They do not affect my support, or the lack of it,  for western oil and gas.   The subject was if WE support it.

Not even sure how the Russian anthem found its way on this page, or that space shuttle movie, if that's what it actually is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Yzermandius19 said:

The workings of the government effect support levels for western oil and gas, hence the side tangent. If it weren't for the shotgun marriage for Confederation, Western Oil and Gas would have more buyers, especially within what is currently Canada. It is Confederation which emphasizes the differing interests of the provinces and exacerbates the issue. There would be more East-West trade within Canada without Confederation, it is confederation which puts a damper on it.

Indeed, because Confederation is a failed state without a unifying national interest, the fear of that Zombie messing with the provinces is what makes things grind to a halt.

The provinces are made into squabbling children by the national helicopter parent, and this is start to become absurd.

You have provinces waging economic warfare against each other and the Feds don't know whose side they are on, they are just flailing.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

This is the Liberals. 

The are Americanized republicans.

What is left of Canada once it is not British anymore?

Just the self hating Americans you see now, Democrat Partyland.

Self Hating American Republicans from Democrat Partyland buy more Western Canada oil and gas than the Self Hating Americanized Democrat Farm Team does within provinces trapped behind the Iron Curtain against American Freedom, aka Confederation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, cougar said:

They do not affect my support, or the lack of it,  for western oil and gas.   The subject was if WE support it.

Not even sure how the Russian anthem found its way on this page, or that space shuttle movie, if that's what it actually is.

It may not effect your support, but it effects the level of support of others. If you want the thread to only be about whether or not you support it, lobby for a change in the name of the thread title to " Does Cougar Support Western Oil and Gas?". In the meantime you can stop projecting what effects your support of Western Oil and Gas on everyone else.

Edited by Yzermandius19

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Yzermandius19 said:

Self Hating American Republicans from Democrat Partyland buy more Western Canada oil and gas than the Self Hating Americanized Democrat Farm Team does within provinces trapped behind the Iron Curtain against American Freedom, aka Confederation.

That's the other bizarre paradox, the fact that Canadian Democrat Partyland thinks the Democrats are actually their friends who are looking out for them, when really the Dems are out to screw Canada.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, cougar said:

They do not affect my support, or the lack of it,  for western oil and gas.   The subject was if WE support it.

Not even sure how the Russian anthem found its way on this page, or that space shuttle movie, if that's what it actually is.

We are simply discussing why we don't support Western OIl & Gas.

It's a nationalist appeal, we are examining what nation is appealing to us and why we would tell them to go eat a back of dicks,

You can feel free to go eat a bag of dicks too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

We are simply discussing why we don't support Western OIl & Gas.

It's a nationalist appeal, we are examining what nation is appealing to us and why we would tell them to go eat a back of dicks,

You can feel free to go eat a bag of dicks too.

Certainly isn't our fault that certain users on this forum lack basic reading comprehension skills, they can go eat a bag of dicks indeed.

Edited by Yzermandius19

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Yzermandius19 said:

Certainly isn't our fault that certain users on this forum lack basic reading comprehension skills, they can go eat a bag of dicks indeed.

Economic nationalism is just dumb.  Particularly in the case of Canada the Company Town.

Why would I support any oil and gas companies on the basis of what country they are extracting from, in a global market?

The only reason to invest in an oil company right now would be the dividend, but the highest are BP and Royal Dutch Shell, doesn't matter where they drill though.

What do these rube Canadians even think they get out of the deal, by this "support" to "Western Oil & Gas" ?

Economic nationalism is a scam.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...