Jump to content
Political Discussion Forums

The Presidential Debate


Recommended Posts

Oh, you looked it up, good job.

And I'm well aware of what your side of the 'political aisle' are saying.  They say that because they refuse to see that Trump is who he is.   His bad behavior is always explained away because of someone or something else, never does he or his supporters take responsibility. 

Essentially your side of the politcal aisle is no longer rational.  Rational people of all political stripes are on the other side of this aisle.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 282
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Far cheaper to use the Canadian playbook....just become a NATO deadbeat and beg somebody else to carry the load.

These are not debates. A proper political debate is formated with a set time allotment where each side is given, say 10 minutes, to state their plan for government should they be elected, without inte

The biggest failure of the night was the moderator, IMO. He should have anticipated this. You don't open the debate the way he did, with these guys. You lay out the law right at the beginning, and the

Posted Images

But that's all just more of your imagination based on more nothing, Dora. It's only what you'd like to believe. 

We've been complaining about the bias of the Progressive's debate commission allied with RINO infiltrators since at least Obama. 

Do you not remember the complaints about Stephanopoulus desperate need to feed  contraception questions into the debate because apparently that was a non-issue the Dems wanted to campaign on in the upcoming weeks?

Do you not remember debate moderator Candy Crowley helping Obama rebut a Romney argument with incorrect information?

Remember Michelle Obama being allowed to cheerlead Democratic reaction in the peanut gallery.

How about Donna Brazile feeding previews of questions to Hillary? Remember that?

Because we noticed all that over on my side of the aisle. And in spite of what you'd like to believe, we've been discussing it for some time.

And now the guys who fed the Steele Dossier to the media creating the 'Russian Collusion Delusion' are running the show. We're discussing that too.

Edited by Infidel Dog
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, dialamah said:

Oh, you looked it up, good job.

And I'm well aware of what your side of the 'political aisle' are saying.  They say that because they refuse to see that Trump is who he is.   His bad behavior is always explained away because of someone or something else, never does he or his supporters take responsibility. 

Essentially your side of the politcal aisle is no longer rational.  Rational people of all political stripes are on the other side of this aisle.

Are you really talking about bad behaviour now?

Honest to god you don't even know what that is.

Bad behaviour is cheating during the Dem primaries by rigging them against Bernie Sanders.

Bad behaviour is cheating by getting the debate moderator to give you the questions ahead of time so that you can prepare a lengthy answer.

Bad behaviour is getting Russians to compile a fake dossier so that you can get the FBI to do a fake investigation into a political opponent based on the false info in it.

Bad behaviour is inciting racial violence, rioting and looting when you're doing a commencement speech to high school kids.

Bad behaviour is getting your kid a $30K/mo job from Burisma and then threatening to withhold $1B in loan guarantees from the Ukranian gov't unless they stop an investigation into that company.

Trump says things that you don't like, boohoo. You'd rather have repugnant criminals in the WH starting wars overseas and then letting Americans just die without aiding them at all? 

Obama turned the US into a racially divided shitshow and turned the ME into a genocidal terrorist heaven, stocked with slaves for tha rapin'! That's worse than bad behaviour, that's criminally bad governance.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Infidel Dog said:

Because we noticed all that over on my side of the aisle. And in spite of what you'd like to believe, we've been discussing it for some time.

On the right side of the aisle people talk about things that are actually true, or they talk about ongoing investigations into things that might eventually be proven.

On the left they make up stories which are instantly accepted as fact and then they lie about them once they're disproven. Rule of thumb is, if their lips are moving they're lying. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I forgot to mention, bad behaviour is a 29 yr old girl dating a prominent 60 yr old politician to sleep her way into extremely lucrative and influential government jobs. 
 

Makes ya think twice about why Sniffy Joe picked Kamala after she brought up all those unfortunate truths about him. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's one you're unlikely to hear on CNN, MSNBC or your evening News:

Quote

Hundreds of physicians across the country have taken issue with the Commission on Presidential Debates canceling the second presidential debate – which was originally scheduled for Thurs., Oct. 15th – because of President Donald Trump's Wuhan coronavirus diagnosis. Dr. Sean Conley, the physician to the president, has since cleared Trump to return to public events and gatherings now that the president has successfully completed his treatment and tested negative for the virus.

 

But at least 175 physicians across the country have written to the Commission on Presidential Debates saying the second debate should move forward as originally planned as long as both candidates are socially distant, The New York Post reported.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/bethbaumann/2020/10/11/nearly-200-doctors-theres-no-medical-reason-for-the-second-debate-to-remain-canceled-n2577840

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/11/2020 at 11:12 AM, Infidel Dog said:

You're openly discriminating against leftists with your blatant display of facts :o

Link to post
Share on other sites

Trump vindicated on the second debate, in a big way:

Quote

“Steve Scully of @cspan had a very bad week. When his name was announced, I said he would not be appropriate because of conflicts,” Trump tweeted. “I was right! Then he said he was hacked, he wasn’t. I was right again! But his biggest mistake was “confiding” in a lowlife loser like the Mooch. Sad!” 

The story is a tiny window into things going on behind the scenes. It's bizarre that, as the moderator of an upcoming debate he asked that question to Scarramucci. What else can you draw from this but, them's in cahoots.


Deepstate much?  :o

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Tell a friend

    Love Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
×
×
  • Create New...