Jump to content
Political Discussion Forums

Recommended Posts

On 11/26/2020 at 12:46 AM, BeaverFever said:

Your whole world is crumbling around you. The imaginary web of conspirators you’ve created for yourself gets bigger and bigger by the minute in order to explain the reality that’s crashing down on you and your failed loser of a false god. It’s so sweet. 😁😁😁😁😁

Update:

 

The imaginary web of conspirators has expanded to include Bill Barr

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 627
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

So the news organization that couldn't accept Trump as president now has it on good authority that no fraud occurred, eh?  Well they should be happy to have it looked at by the courts then.  Trump wil

It's fascinating to watch people refuse to accept reality when it's clear as day in front of them. It's no coincidence the covid-is-a-hoax people are the same ones who claim the election is a fraud. T

Two things.  It's not up to some manager to decide what's before the courts.  Also, this is just one of many possible crimes that was committed, and no doubt the Trump legal team is not tipping their

Posted Images

It's funny but the AP's telling of their interview with Barr seems to differ in the way it's put across than the way Reuters does it at the now leftist National Post. The AP doesn't seem to be saying there was no evidence.  In the AP one Barr claims only, "people were confusing the use of the federal criminal justice system with allegations that should be made in civil lawsuits. He said such a remedy for those complaints would be a top-down audit conducted by state or local officials, not the U.S. Justice Department."

https://www.citizenfreepress.com/breaking/william-barr-breaks-his-silence-weve-found-fraud-but-not-enough-to-change-any-state-outcome/

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

It's funny but the AP's telling of their interview with Barr seems to differ in the way it's put across than the way Reuters does it at the now leftist National Post. The AP doesn't seem to be saying there was no evidence.  In the AP one Barr claims only, "people were confusing the use of the federal criminal justice system with allegations that should be made in civil lawsuits. He said such a remedy for those complaints would be a top-down audit conducted by state or local officials, not the U.S. Justice Department."

https://www.citizenfreepress.com/breaking/william-barr-breaks-his-silence-weve-found-fraud-but-not-enough-to-change-any-state-outcome/

You can’t read very well can you?

 

To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have affected a different outcome in the election,” Barr told the AP.

 

Barr didn’t name Powell specifically but said: “There’s been one assertion that would be systemic fraud and that would be the claim that machines were programmed essentially to skew the election results. And the DHS and DOJ have looked into that, and so far, we haven’t seen anything to substantiate that,” Barr said.


How can it be spelled out any simpler for your tiny closed mind?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Announcements




  • Tell a friend

    Love Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
×
×
  • Create New...