Jump to content
Political Discussion Forums

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Infidel Dog said:

Nonsense. 2 pages ago I began countering your crazy idea that any media noticing the martyring of a murdering rapist was racist and therefore false.

You're trapped into defending the scum and you seem to believe you can get out of it by calling anybody who notices what you're doing a racist.

You can't, Dummy. It's not working. Calling racist to anybody who disagrees with you doesn't work anymore in general. I'm baffled as to why you can't figure that out. You haven't got the word yet from high command? Is that it?

Now you have resorted to fiction writing. Who do you think you are...the next Tom Clancy?

Edited by Petros
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 135
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

The people who argued that posting a picture of yourself holding an effigy of the president's severed head are now trying to convince us that creating political memes is worthy of jail time.  A g

You. Are. So. Desperate.  Trump and his goons incited the violence from his  deplorable sum-of-the-earth supporters. He told them to march on the capitol. I never said that was a verbatim quote    

If someone says that....and then immediately proceeds to throw the president from the aircraft at 30,000 ft cruising altitude, prosecutors will definitely use those words against him in court to show

Posted Images

16 hours ago, Petros said:

Everything on the the internet is BS, isn't it WestCan.

Unless, of course, it fits your far right narrative. 

Everything that's false is BS, ins't it Petros?

Except of course, it fits your far left narrative. 

 

"Killing people during riots was considered mostly peaceful for 3 years, but for 95 minutes it was illegal and immoral! The tens of thousands of Democrat murderers and arsonists and looters and rioters, plus the millions of Democrats and all the members of the gov't who fully supported them, do not represent the Democrats or their voters in any way!

The 200 people (some of them leftist activists) who rioted at the capitol represent all conservatives, especially the ones who instantly denounced their violence!" - Extreme Leftist Dolt

Do you understand why some people might find the opinions of extreme leftist dolts utterly worthless?

Do you understand why it seems as though you are in lock step with the above?

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Everything that's false is BS, ins't it Petros?

Except of course, it fits your far left narrative. 

 

"Killing people during riots was considered mostly peaceful for 3 years, but for 95 minutes it was illegal and immoral! The tens of thousands of Democrat murderers and arsonists and looters and rioters, plus the millions of Democrats and all the members of the gov't who fully supported them, do not represent the Democrats or their voters in any way!

The 200 people (some of them leftist activists) who rioted at the capitol represent all conservatives, especially the ones who instantly denounced their violence!" - Extreme Leftist Dolt

Do you understand why some people might find the opinions of extreme leftist dolts utterly worthless?

Do you understand why it seems as though you are in lock step with the above?

If I did not know any better, I would have sworn that post existed before, but it has been slightly modified.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Argus said:

Meme, unit of cultural information spread by imitation. The term meme (from the Greek mimema, meaning “imitated”) was introduced in 1976 by British evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins in his work The Selfish Gene.

The 45 yr old definition of a meme is no longer the sole definition of the word Argus.

The internet wasn't a thing back then for commoners like us.

Dozens of new words have been invented of the past 45 years, for obvious reasons.

What was the definition of "selfie" 45 years ago?

Didn't exist.

A perfectly acceptable usage of the word "meme" now includes: "A funny picture with a caption".

Go show any kid the "Picture with the funny caption" of Karen and the cat, and ask them what it is. It's a "meme". 

You need to replace your old red Thorndike Barnhart.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Petros said:

If I did not know any better, I would have sworn that post existed before, but it has been slightly modified.

It was modified to show the quote coming from a more generic source, instead of just paraphrasing a specific person who actually conveys the exact same message over and over anyways. I thought that I was actually doing them a favour by illustrating their point quite succinctly.

You'd think that people who consider a severed-head effigy to be freedom of speech could see the value of it, but I have no qualms with my post coming down if it violated forum rules (which it most certainly did).

Is there something in that quote that you would personally disagree with? 

It went like this:

Quote

"Killing people during riots was "mostly peaceful" for 3 years, but for 95 minutes in 2021 it was illegal and immoral! The tens of thousands of Democrat murderers and arsonists and looters and rioters, plus the millions of Democrats and all the members of the gov't who fully supported them, do not represent the Democrats or their voters in any way!

The 200 people (some of them leftist activists) who rioted at the capitol represent all conservatives, especially the ones who instantly denounced their violence!"

You can use that quote and claim it for your own if you like. Maybe get it printed on a T-shirt. No royalties need be paid, it's my gift to you. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, Petros said:

Now you have resorted to fiction writing. Who do you think you are...the next Tom Clancy?

If you don't want people to notice you're defending a murdering rapist stop doing it.

I would say the same thing to anybody who wants to call media noticing individuals and organizations martyring the guy "racists."

If you don't want people to notice how ridiculous that is, stop doing it. Name calling won't help you Southern Poverty Law Center. If it did there are plenty of names people could call you. And they'd all be accurate.

Edited by Infidel Dog
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Infidel Dog said:

If you don't want people to notice you're defending a murdering rapist stop doing it.

I would say the same thing to anybody who wants to call media noticing individuals and organizations martyring the guy "racists."

If you don't want people to notice how ridiculous that is, stop doing it. Name calling won't help you Southern Poverty Law Center. If it did there are plenty of names people could call you. And they'd all be accurate.

lol....again you seem to believe the saying that "If you tell a lie over and over again, people will eventually believe it."

Now, let us get back on the topic.  If not, who do you think will win the NHL Canadian Division.

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

It was modified to show the quote coming from a more generic source, instead of just paraphrasing a specific person who actually conveys the exact same message over and over anyways. I thought that I was actually doing them a favour by illustrating their point quite succinctly.

You'd think that people who consider a severed-head effigy to be freedom of speech could see the value of it, but I have no qualms with my post coming down if it violated forum rules (which it most certainly did).

Is there something in that quote that you would personally disagree with? 

It went like this:

You can use that quote and claim it for your own if you like. Maybe get it printed on a T-shirt. No royalties need be paid, it's my gift to you. 

I already have a t-shirt I wear that says "WestCanMan is the answer to World Peace." However, I have worn it so many times, it is beginning to fade.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Petros said:

lol....again you seem to believe the saying that "If you tell a lie over and over again, people will eventually believe it."

Now, let us get back on the topic.  If not, who do you think will win the NHL Canadian Division.

The Canucks are making a miraculous comeback in the second half. Trust me. ;)

But on the subject of trusted media. I'll listen to both sides to see who's making the most sense. But if somebody tells me I can't pay attention if an article doesn't line up with their group think they can get stuffed. 

And if they tell me I have to line up with the side that wants to martyr a triple killer and rape-killer of a teenage girl because he follows a religion they favor, and if I don't I'm a racist, they can get double-stuffed.

Edited by Infidel Dog
Link to post
Share on other sites

"To gain support, Hitler popularized the term "Lügenpresse."

Literally meaning "lying press," he would accuse media companies that did not support the Nazi party of false reporting."

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Petros said:

I already have a t-shirt I wear that says "WestCanMan is the answer to World Peace." However, I have worn it so many times, it is beginning to fade.

Sadly, I just have the answer. I'm sitting on it, along with the Grinch, who's got the cure for world hunger. We be chillin'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Tell a friend

    Love Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
×
×
  • Create New...