Jump to content
Political Discussion Forums

Recommended Posts

OK, down with pessimism and sorrow! This pandemic thread is only for positive news. And do we have some:

Israel: vaccinated 21% of population, including about 70% of aged over 60 (1.9 million in total). Plans to complete vaccination by early spring.

The country has reached an agreement with Pfizer for uninterrupted vaccine supply in return for real-time vaccination statistics.

USA: achieves vaccination rate of 1.3 million doses daily

Pandemics impact:

Australia (population 25.4 million): 909 deaths

Taiwan (23.8 million): cases 923 deaths 9

South Korea (51.7 million): 1,464

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sweden has good control of the virus in their country. Daily deaths near zero. Cases per day are still high, 2000 but trending downward.

Sweden has about 561,656 active cases, of which 561,420 are "in mild condition". A total of 236 cases "serious or critical".

That is 236/561,656 = .00042 which is 0.042%

Sweden accomplished this without many of the harsh measures imposed by other countries around the world.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, OftenWrong said:

Sweden accomplished this without many of the harsh measures imposed by other countries around the world.

Note also that per capita, the cost of the pandemics in Sweden is virtually the same as in Quebec. Compare consistent "1.5 meter economy" message from early spring 2020 no harsh measures, vs. two lockdowns a host of obscure and contradictory policies, orders and fines and counting. Again, "desperate" vs. "effective".

Link to post
Share on other sites

Vaccination in UK is progressing at an accelerating pace. The target for Monday 15.02 is 15 million of the population with at least the first doze of the vaccine (approx. 22.5% of population).

In Israel more than half of the population has been vaccinated (approx. 3.5 million).

Canada's current progress: approximately 1.2 million or 2.5% of the population.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

Yes and some more good news- Canada is going to start receiving vaccines again. We expect a shipment of 900,000 doses for this week.

So the Astrazenica cannot be used by the elderly, who are the most at risk group and slated to be inoculated first. But it's ok! We'll give it to the prisoners instead!

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

UK reports today (March 20, 2021) vaccinating over 50% population (at least one shot) and the highest number of delivered vaccinations daily. Plans to complete vaccination of priority groups, including general population 50+ by end of April.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Similar Content

    • By Zeitgeist
      Is anyone else disgusted by the draconian, unjust deep sixing of the Toronto BBQ owner who defied the lockdown order to open indoor dining for three days?   This story illustrates exactly why people have become distrustful of the police and government.  The $187,000 fine imposed on this business owner is vindictive and doesn't fit the crime.  It does explain why small business owners and people in general are suspicious of restrictions that prevent someone from operating a business and earning a livelihood.  I just don't think government should have the right to impose such restrictions.  The right to earn a living is a basic human right. If you don't want to eat out, then don't.  Ensuring social distancing and reduced capacity is one thing, destroying someone's business to make a point that police and government hold all the cards, right or wrong, isn't okay.   What recourse does this guy have without taking expensive legal action that he probably can't afford?
      https://apple.news/A7SiAcw1sRxCR3d6CmZlinA
       
    • By myata
      Right off the news (CBC): officials around a retirement home in Ontario reported to have jumped the queue in vaccine distribution. Board members, the director and the family etc were ostensibly given the "leftover vaccines" to avoid it being wasted.
      Here, our humble public servants yet again in all their caring glory. If this is not the third world, and not somewhere on a remote reserve but right here in the nation's capitals, then what is?
      In early December Health Canada approved the first vaccine for use in the country. As early as October national and provincial task forces were assembled and started training in vaccine distribution. Some were shown on TV under serious fanfare. What does it mean? Does it mean that now, February (months on), there is no standard procedure for effective and fair use of remainders, if any? And we have to thank our luck that board members, directors and family only by sheer chance all happened to be in the right place at the right time so that precious elixir was saved?
      Iacobelli claims the leftover vaccine with a limited shelf life "would go to waste" and thus "a decision to prevent this from happening was made."
      Not funny. Hardly entertaining. Simply disgusting. Looks like Lebanon, or Nicaragua. But who can say, entirely unexpected and not logical and natural evolution, of an entitled democracy?
      P.S. It's hard to say this, but maybe in some ways at least we should be grateful for this experience. It revealed so much about ourselves, as we as a society really are in this mirror, not as we want to paint us to ourselves, that wouldn't be easy to find out otherwise - even if we cared to.
    • By Zeitgeist
      It's estimated that 20 percent of retailers will go out of business in Canada due to public health restrictions.  Workers and business owners are being forced onto government subsistence handouts for the sake of preventing viral spread. Rather than letting people decide whether they want to risk shopping or patronizing businesses, government is deciding for them and destroying some livelihoods.  Is it fair?
  • Tell a friend

    Love Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
×
×
  • Create New...